University officials say they cannot afford to maintain one of the largest herbariums in the United States. Researchers are urging Duke to reconsider.

Duke University has decided to close its herbarium, a collection of 825,000 specimens of plants, fungi and algae that was established more than a century ago. The collection, one of the largest and most diverse in the country, has helped scientists map the diversity of plant life and chronicle the impact of humans on the environment.

The university’s decision has left researchers reeling. “This is such a devastating blow for biodiversity science,” said Erika Edwards, the curator of the Yale Herbarium. “The entire community is simultaneously shocked and outraged.”

Scientific societies have also protested the move. “Duke’s decision to forgo responsibility of their herbarium specimens sets a terrible precedent,” the Natural Science Collections Alliance wrote in a letter to the university last Friday.

The alliance, along with six other scientific societies, endorsed a petition asking Duke to reconsider closing the herbarium. As of Wednesday, it had gained over 11,000 signatures.

Non-paywall link

  • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Whose idea was it to give one of the shittiest universities such a big responsibility? Duke is basically a giant sports program with a religious school attached. What do they care about science?

    • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Calling Duke a ‘religious school’ is disingenuous. They are a secular school that has a divinity program. The university pre-dates the divinity school by almost a century.

      They are widely seen as a world class medical, business and law school. Contributions include, the first ultrasound imaging, the first CFD analysis software, and cochlear implant development.

      They don’t focus on sports anymore than other peer institutions (think Northwestern, Stanford, Vanderbilt, or Notre Dame) they just caught lightning in a bottle with Coach K, and have been really good at basketball for a while.

      I say all of this to highlight, they are a legitimate, well funded active contributor to academia and research.

      They aren’t some hack religious institution that’s trying to play being a real school while shoveling indoctrination down your throat like BYU or Liberty.

      Duke is a legitimate research university that should be criticized even more harshly for the decision outlined in the article because of their history as a top tier research institution, not because they’re “a religious school that doesn’t care about science.”

      • batmaniam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        After a quick googling, they also were on the religiously unpopular side of embryonic stem cells.

        • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          “Duke says embryos aren’t children, which anyone with eyes can see, and that’s why they’re a great university.”

          • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            They’re a secular institution that was on the leading edge of stem cell research when it was far more controversial than it is now.

            I don’t think those are “low-ass” standards.

              • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Scientists tend to care about science, that is indeed correct.

                Your earlier comment stated that they didn’t care for science and where preoccupied with religious ideologies.

                Which is it that you believe now?

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s like saying “they have commitments to a cult, but they’re good at science.” I don’t think non-secular institutions should have accreditation. Period.

  • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well if they’re that upset about it, maybe they could help maintain it as well financially. Still sucks that it’s happening, these institutions usually have more than enough money to throw around for something they deem this significant.