One of the main arguments brought forth for the switching to the WebExtensions system for browser extensions was that it made cross-browser extensions easier. Firefox users may now reap the benefits of this promise, as Mozilla has implemented functionality in the browser to import extensions from other browsers.

The feature, which is in testing at the moment, can be enabled by all users of the latest stable version of Firefox.

The feature is limited at the time to Google Chrome and select extensions. Even though Firefox and Chrome extensions use the same framework, WebExtensions, they are not compatible immediately. Firefox users who attempt to install extensions from Chrome’s Web Store may notice that this is not working.

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    ·
    10 months ago

    Very misleading title. You cannot actually install Chrome extensions which is what I assumed after reading the title.

    What this does is that when migrating from Chrome, you can automatically install supported extensions that are also in the Mozilla addons store.

    • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      IIRC there’s a standard being worked on that would allow actual crosscompatibility, so give or take 5 more years

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        There is already a standard on how websites should work and still some claim they can’t run on linux or Firefox

          • Link.wav [he/him]@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ok??? But that doesn’t prevent this from Google exerting further influence over what happens with addons in Firefox.

            Two words: Manifest v3

            Google’s been in the business of destroying its competitors since 2001. It’s pretty naive not to foresee some huge problems here.

            • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Eh? Firefox supports Manifest V3 as well. I don’t find anything naive about it. Firefox supporting Chrome extensions can only help Firefox.

              • Link.wav [he/him]@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Obviously I hope you’re right, but I just don’t see Google’s involvement as a net positive. At one time, we believed Google was contributing to projects that they subsequently destroyed. I assure you that Google would find any way to leverage this to harm Firefox.

                Meanwhile, I don’t see how it would benefit Firefox. What benefits Firefox is when people develop addons for Firefox exclusively.

                • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Nope, what benefits Firefox is when something is working on Firefox.

                  As an example, I use Revolut and most importantly the one-time virtual cards by Revolut. They have a nice Chrome addon that lets you fill the card details. Otherwise I have to get my phone, open the app, authorize with PIN, check the card details, authorize with PIN again, rewrite the card details and check that I didn’t make a mistake. If the Chrome addon worked in Firefox, it would make my life significantly easier. Sure, the ideal scenario is Revolut supporting Firefox themselves but for whatever reasons they don’t want to.

      • hcbxzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        WebExtensions was supposed to be that standard from the beginning, but failed miserably due to bad design

    • donnachaidh@lemmy.dcmrobertson.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      10 months ago

      Instead of importing the Chrome extension directly, Firefox is installing the Firefox version of the extension from Mozilla’s own extension store.

      Seems like it’s just for making the switch from Chrome smoother, rather than being useful for long-time Firefox users.

        • donnachaidh@lemmy.dcmrobertson.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          Seems like it. The article also mentioned that there are only 73 pairs available, so it sounds like Mozilla has to explicitly define what Chrome extensions corresponds to what Firefox extension.

      • stormio@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        I was moderately intrigued by this story until I got to that part. The headline is correct but kind of misleading. I’m sure many people will read it and think Firefox can now run Chrome extensions directly.

    • DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      as a roblox player ropro is a extension that used to be avaible in firefox great extension it brings features like hours played on a game server hopping server selection and more trading stuff if your trading on roblox

  • nieceandtows@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Only 73 are supported right now. This sounds like a big feature if it ends up supporting all the chrome extensions.