• Oddbin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve seen people claim it’s over powered but I’m thinking it’s appropriatly set for it’s intended target and we’ve not come up against the reason it’s been added.

    Also the guy at the map table said something about who is masterminding the Automatons plans. I’m thinking Illuminate are coming and this is for them.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      People who say it’s OP have never tried the EAT. Or they are salty recoilless enjoyers (I do think the non-disposable recoilless deserves a few buffs. Maybe a little faster self reloads and/or 1 more rocket in the backpack)

      Illuminates had no heavy armor at all in HD1, even the faction boss had only medium armor IIRC. The only use I had for my trusty EAT against them was to easily 1shot the obelisks when they started to open up.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        What deserves buffs is the Spear. A recoilless is a long-loading EAT. All it needs is what people have been asking for - the ability to feed someone’s recoilless from their own backpack, and it’ll be great. The spear has the same downtime the quasar does, with the added caveat that you can’t really aim it so it often isn’t a 1 shot kill like it should be, very few rockets that replenish one at a time, and a targetting system that is so cursed it probably uses dead orphans with ADHD in there.

        • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah the spear is just trash right now unfortunately. At the very least it needs to have more reliable lock on, better homing because how the fuck am I missing more shots with the space javelin than with the dumbfire RRs ? And it wouldn’t hurt to get 2 rockets from ammo pickups instead of 1.

          Also the recoilless has 1 single advantage over the EAT (aside from the obvious ammo count) in that it can shoot as soon as you equip it, whereas the EAT has some dust cover thingy that needs to be opened (and closed if you stow it)

        • Arbiter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean, with someone loading the recoilless it isn’t even long loading, pretty effective AT volume of fire

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, but you’ll never get a player to give up their backpack to wear your ammo. Unless you get 2 of them at once (and at that point, why bother with paired reload?), it isn’t really feasible. What would need to happen, is an ability to reload someone’s weapons from their own backpack instead. It would be a lot more teamwork, and in the event of an armored enemy, would get the person that’s chaff oriented to reload the recoilless. Sadly no news on them going that route yet.

  • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fun meme but honestly considering how ridiculously overpowered it is, I’m surprised at how fast it is, with infinite ammo.

    • ralakus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hope if/when they nerf it, they just increase the cool down time or even just add some kind of limited ammo like heatsinks or something and keep all other stats the same. I highly doubt they’re gonna leave it alone since it’s now become “meta” to a lot of players and it outshines many other anti armor options against bugs except maybe EATs

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        They could just buff other ATs instead. Lots of them are in a bad spot. Nerfing what’s popular won’t get you a balanced game, it will get you annoyed players and the sticker that says “no fun allowed”

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yo pitch me why you like the Quasar over, say, Autocannon.

    I wanna love every laser and I wanna paint the world in burning light, but I can’t seem to get a good feel for the Quasar. In what situations are you using it and where do you think it shines?

    • Aphelion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can one-shot drop ships out of the sky, causing it to drop on top of the bots that were just delivered: I get 10-13 kill streaks with one shot. It smokes a hulk in one shot to the face, and 2 shots to the front of a tank turrent.

      On bugs, you can blow a chargers head off in one shot, kill shrieker nests in 2 shots, and blow the head off a titan in 2.

      It’s an absolute monster weapon that borders on OP, which makes me think Joel is about to shaft us with way tougher enemies soon.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s an infinite recoilless with long charge up time. That’s it. If you are generally positioning away from fights, have trouble finding the right moment to reload the recoilless or have bad aiming, it’s good/better than them. If you are generally frontlining, the charge up time will get you killed in situations where a recoilless, which is instantly ready to shoot, or the EAT that readies up in less than 1 sec (and you can do it while running) will outshine it.

      It’s not in the same category as the AC at all. But if you want to vary things up, as a fellow autocannon enjoyer, I would recommend the arc thrower. It kinda fills the same niche of anti-medium/anti-hordes. It’s much better at anti horde duty than the AC but a little worse at dealing with medium armor, and has less range. Which it trades for better multi-target damages and zero reloads/ammo management. Also positioning is more important than with the AC to set up good arc chains/not kill your friends/avoid the arc getting blocked by terrain, dead bodies or bushes. Also it will still deal some damage against hard targets where the AC just bounces off. For example I find it easier to kill chargers with it than the AC because you just have to arc them in the face 5-6 times.

    • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I am 100% a Quasar enjoyer, personally I like the cadence of it. You pull it out behind cover, let it spin up, shoulder-peek and delete something, then put it away for 10-15 seconds and it’s ready to go all over again. No backpack slot, no ammo concerns, no reload animation, no waiting for a call-in to deal with a heavy. The Quasar projectile has no projectile drop either, making it hands-down the best weapon in the game to snipe bot dropships or distant objectives. I’d be reluctant to “waste” an EAT or RR shot on a Devastator, but the Quasar’s infinite ammo means I’ll happily zap one on that 15-second cadence if there’s nothing bigger to shoot at.

      One piece of advice for using the Quasar: don’t use Aim-Down-Sights. I use ADS with most guns in this game, but not the Quasar. If you’ve only used it first-person then you might not realize that the third-person reticle for the Quasar gives way more information. The reticle spins and slowly turns from a square into a circle when it’s about to fire, making it easier to time your shot when shoulder-peeking. The reticle turns red while it’s on cooldown, white when it’s good to go again. The ADS view gives you none of this information visually.

      My group runs 8s if we feel like pushing ourselves, 7s if we want a less frantic pace. At those difficulties there are a lot of heavies to deal with, and the Quasar feels like the most flexible tool for dealing with them. The RR can shoot faster with a team reload, but that requires coordination that can be hard to manage under pressure. The EAT can give you two quick shots per call-in, but then you’re left with a minute-long dry spell before the destroyer can give you any more rocket goodness.

      The Autocannon will tend to struggle against Tanks and Hulks. That said, if you enjoy the AC then go with what you like! One of the regulars in my group usually brings an AC, and I’m happy to have them there because it can deal with other targets for which the Quasar isn’t suited. Against bots the AC shreds walkers, against bugs it pops spewers, and against both its splash damage will clear chafe packs quickly. I wouldn’t want a full team of ACs on a 7 or 8, but one or two are always welcome in the mix.

      • ferret@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        They added a wee little bar under the scope on the quasar showing charge, so it is much easier to edge the shot now

        • CountVon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah that was much needed, as otherwise 3rd-person view actually gave way more information than 1st-person.