jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 个月前Google mocks Epic’s proposed reforms to end Android app market monopolyarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down111
arrow-up1138arrow-down1external-linkGoogle mocks Epic’s proposed reforms to end Android app market monopolyarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 个月前message-square33fedilink
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·6 个月前I must have had an extension at the time, but it sounds like F-Droid does automatic updates for anything Android 12+ now? https://f-droid.org/de/2024/02/01/twif.html I guess the nag screen can be scary, though. Good point
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down2·6 个月前The nag screen is important for a bunch of less technically literate people who would otherwise install malware without thinking twice. Or even once.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·6 个月前I really don’t know how to feel about it The people it’s intended to protect will just click “yes” to anything in my experience I don’t have a statistical analysis of results over a normal distribution of the world population, though
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 个月前I feel like Epic wouldn’t be so strident about it without proof that it negatively affecting install rate. But maybe the perception that it affects the rate is sufficient.
minus-squareSMillerNL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 个月前I think it affects install rate by design, which is bad for Epic in this case but good for security in most
I must have had an extension at the time, but it sounds like F-Droid does automatic updates for anything Android 12+ now?
https://f-droid.org/de/2024/02/01/twif.html
I guess the nag screen can be scary, though. Good point
The nag screen is important for a bunch of less technically literate people who would otherwise install malware without thinking twice.
Or even once.
I really don’t know how to feel about it
The people it’s intended to protect will just click “yes” to anything in my experience
I don’t have a statistical analysis of results over a normal distribution of the world population, though
I feel like Epic wouldn’t be so strident about it without proof that it negatively affecting install rate.
But maybe the perception that it affects the rate is sufficient.
I think it affects install rate by design, which is bad for Epic in this case but good for security in most
deleted by creator