• USSR Enjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re not show-stoppers compared to Western tech, but they could still be good workstations.

    not every pc needs to be a monster; most people really don’t need a desktop much more powerful than a high-end phone. the gains loongson has made in power efficiency is a good track to be on.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly, especially when running Linux that doesn’t have all the bloat of windows or macos. I also imagine that top priority is replacing western hardware and software in use by the government. You don’t need bleeding edge hardware to do email, spreadsheets, and document editing.

      • FuckBigTech347@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not like you have any choice other than GNU/Linux if you get a LoongArch based computer lol. I don’t think Apple will ever give a shit and Microsoft currently only has an ARM port of Windows which mostly works on some aarch64 boards. It’s obviously a move to make themselves more independent of western closed source garbage.

        You don’t need bleeding edge hardware to do email, spreadsheets, and document editing.

        emacs ftw.

      • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        What, you are saying I don’t need a watercooled 7800x3d to check my email!? Next you will be insinuating I don’t need a 4090 for Minecraft.

  • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even if they aren’t “show-stoppers”, it’s great to see more alternatives emerging. Shouldn’t the free market love more competition?

    People seem to be arguing that $375 is too expensive for a board, but are they just missing the fact that it’s a bundle with the CPU and cooler? The 3A6000 apparently is roughly equivalent to an intel 10100. (which is about $100 MSRP these days). DDR4 is fine for most people’s use cases, and it seems like it has enough PCI and nvme slots that anybody would really need. It also pulls less power than most intel chipsets, which could definitely be of interest to people.

    You aren’t building a high end video editing or gaming rig with this, but it seems like it’d be a perfectly respectable every day use machine. Which is exactly the type of chips I would expect them to make first.

    I would not be surprised if we see Lonsoon continue to make more and more competitive chips going forward too.

    • darkernations@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I am not sure if these are currently (ongoing inflation woes aside) competitive enough from a western market perspective given the built-in sinophobia; they have to be exceptionally good value for quality or have no meaningful competition for a chinese name brand (security cameras such as Dahua as an example amongst others, and another tangent example would be Polestar which though is owned by Geely is considered “swedish” ). However, I don’t think that’s the point; like you said these may be the beginning of much more competitive products given track records in all other fields.

      If one takes a less eurocentric view; the above board/cpu bundle is nothing short of amazing. A middle income country while undergoing military seige, sanctions and hybrid wars is able to produce and sell a consumer product higher in the tech-chain in a market that openly declares the producing country a national enemy is market strategy all of these MBAs could not concuct in their wildest dreams. And obviously this is not the only - let alone first - example of this.

      It’s almost as if marxists know how to play in the game of capitalism better than liberals through a deeper and more meaningful understanding of the system.

      Ironically one of the best investor’s handbook over the past century still remains to be Das Kapital.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    What relevant x86-64 patents do AMD & Intel still hold, and if any, is Loongson somehow getting around some or all of them?

      • USSR Enjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        I haven’t looked at the instruction set, but I’ve heard it described as being closer to risc-v. Targeting linux (and probably bsd’s) is a big w, esp for openkylin adoption in the mainland and displacing the m$ monopoly. I’d really like to get my hands on one of these 6k series soon.

      • peace_land_bread@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Their older chips are indeed MIPS based, but the newer ones (including the ones this article is talking about) are using their own LoongArch ISA, which while has a few similarities to MIPS, is not the same.

        Here’s some official LoongArch documentation in English and a very nice blog by WÁNG Xuěruì who is quite involved with the porting of quite a few large projects (the Linux kernel itself, Gentoo, LLVM, Rust, and Go) to LoongArch if you’re interested in reading up about it.

        They’re quite solid chips for basic desktop/office use, and even some very light gaming if paired with a compatible graphics card in my testing. Hopefully Loongson can manage to make a dent in the x86(_64) monopoly in a decade or so :)

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ah neat, thanks for the info. Looks like it really is its own thing now, and makes a lot of sense for the use case of moving the government onto domestic tech.

      • Toes♀
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        If I’m understanding the article correctly it suggests that this chip is x86_64 compatible?

        • USSR Enjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Loongson has its own instruction set similar to MIPS/RISCV which primarily targets Linux. IIRC there are windows builds that can run on the chip, but that says nothing for most of the windows software which is compiled for for x86/x86_64. Linux shines here because most everything that’s open-source can simply be recompiled by anyone and/or made available through binary distribution repos.

  • Toes♀
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Seems really odd to me that they are using DTX.

    I’m guessing it’s intended to be a easy swap for a legacy OEM computer.

    But they do have the 2nd better board that’s mATX.