• tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 个月前

      It seems “open source” means different things for different people.

      If you could see the code but were not allowed to redistribute it then I’d call it “source-available”… but you can redistribute the code, in this unusual case.

      Forbidding reselling to any degree makes it “non-free” (as in freedom), which is the important part. The term “open source” was created to speak about “free software” without the moral or political aspects of user freedom.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 个月前

          Draw.io says it will use Apache but “with an extra line forbidding usage (…)”. It is not the normal Apache license. The extra line is a big difference in principle.

          I hate scamming people but I think that should be fixed in another way.