• Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    They said it had a massive storage capacity, and it was going to be expanded, and kept somewhere safe. What’s the difference if it feels real?

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ironically, what if that’s how our actual reality is even? It’s at least plausible, not that - as you said - it would make any difference if true.

      Moreover, there are postulated by string theory to be 11 dimensions (I mean… who knows whether that is true, but we are speaking hypotheticals here regardless of instantiation of any one actual implementation), yet we only occupy 3 spatial and 1 time. The other spatial, and perhaps more interesting the other potential time, dimensions all offer numerous possibilities.

      The ancient book Flatland does a pretty great job exploring that concept imho.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          And its successor SphereLand is, if not quite in the same league in terms of being ground-breaking (especially for its time), also neat.

          The Matrix was cool bc it popularized such thinking, bringing it out to where it was comfortable to talk about it in more mainstream company. But it most definitely was not the first to expouse that idea that truth is partly what we make of it, as well as not that too.

          img

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          The author died >100 years ago, so the entire text is public domain if anyone wants to read it. https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Flatland

          I don’t like reading books on a screen but… it is hard to pass up free - then again, libraries also exist and THIS BOOK IS WORTHWHILE.

          I could barely put it down the entire time I read it, it just consumed me.

          Just a note, it is actually so offensive to a woman’s role in society that many (most? I have no idea) scholars think that it was so over-the-top that it must have been meant as a critique of the then-status-quo.

          This book has fucking VISION, even centuries into the future.

          img

          Hopefully it won’t remain so for millennia as well - bc of the thoughts finally becoming commonplace in society; but even then it would remain as a historical milestone towards that fantastic end.:-)

          • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Just a note, it is actually so offensive to a woman’s role in society that many (most? I have no idea) scholars think that it was so over-the-top that it must have been meant as a critique of the then-status-quo.

            The author outright stated that it was meant as a critique in the 2nd edition, so there’s no need to guess :)

            • OpenStars@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 minutes ago

              Was that the actual author, or a statement added on their behalf? I thought I recalled reading it as the latter, where it seemed they were just guessing.

              Either way it could be a kind of trigger warning for someone who even knowing that wouldn’t want to read the text.

          • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Your passion makes an excellent case on its own. You convinced me to give it a shot, I’ll look for it at the library. I hope they have it.

              • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Alright so I went to the library and they are getting a copy from another branch, should have it in a few days.

                I think the librarian was kinda impressed I asked for a book from the 1880’s. 😆

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Although in this case it would be sort of like putting a condom on an extremely realistic dildo that didn’t know it was a dildo.

        I’m bad at metaphors.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Correct me if I’m wrong, but…there are actual high resolution blu-rays of TNG because the show was shot on film and the original reels still exist, while DS9 and Voyager were shot on tape so good old NTSC 480i is the best we’ve got. So would hte above image be upscaled via AI or something?

              On a related note, JMS had the foresight to film Babylon 5 in 16:9 format which was cropped to 4:3, so the show does exist in widescreen, though I understand it isn’t in any particular kind of HD, especially the CGI space scenes.