A senior Russian official reiterated Russian President Vladimir Putin’s insistence that negotiations with Ukraine must be based on the same uncompromising demands he made before the full-scale invasion and at the moment of Russia’s greatest territorial gains, despite the fact that Ukraine has liberated a significant amount of territory since then. Russian Federation Council Speaker Valentina Matviyenko stated on December 24 that Russia is open to compromise in negotiations with Ukraine, but that Russia will strictly adhere to the conditions that it laid out during negotiations in Istanbul in March 2022, when Russian troops were advancing on Kyiv and throughout eastern and southern Ukraine.[1] Matviyenko added that Russia would not deviate from these conditions by “one iota.”[2] The partial agreement that emerged during the Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul in March 2022 stated that Ukraine would be a permanently neutral state that could not join NATO, and imposed limitations on the Ukrainian military similar to those imposed by the Treaty of Versailles on Germany after World War I, restricting Ukraine’s Armed Forces to 85,000 soldiers.[3] Russia’s demands at Istanbul were mainly more detailed versions of the demands that Putin made in the months before he launched the full-scale invasion in February 2022, including Ukraine’s “demilitarization” and neutrality.[4] Matviyenko is reiterating Putin’s demand from his annual Direct Line televised press conference on December 19, and more senior Russian officials are likely to make similar claims to domestic and foreign audiences in coming weeks.[5] ISW continues to assess that senior Russian officials’ references to conditions Putin attempted to impose on Ukraine when he believed his full-scale invasion could succeed in a few days in 2022 reflects his projected confidence that he can completely defeat Ukraine militarily despite the tremendous setbacks Ukraine has inflicted on Russian forces since then.
Once again supporting the idea that Putin only wants Ukrainian capitulation and submission.,
While my assumption is that Trump will stop all aid, comply meekly with putin’s demands and then attempt to market this to Americans as a “great success” and a sign that he is a “great negotiator”, I do wonder if putin risks overplaying his hand. While Trump is a coward and an authoritarian, he does seem to be sensitive to anything that makes him look weak.
he does seem to be sensitive to anything that makes me look weak.
So if we’re bullying you, we can put pressure against Trump? Thanks for the hint, will keep that in mind!
Good catch. :) Almost like Freudian slip of sorts.
But does Trump really care about what the people think at this point?
He (probably) can’t run again, he’s got a high likelihood of dying in office, he’s got effective control over both houses of Congress and the SCROTUS.
Not to mention he’s appointing extreme loyalists to every major administrative department that he can get his tiny hands on.
He’s effectively dictator when he takes office.
This is complete speculation on my part, but I think there is a internal component to Trump’s actions.
There was that US comedy show that portrayed Trump as a toddler who was sent to the child’s table by his former adviser. Trump then fired the adviser.
