Back to Ted

  • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    “No, stop farming, infant mortality rates are supposed to be over 50%!”

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’re going to be 100% every few years due to flooding destroying the crops!

  • PorkRollWobbly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    The farming is okay. Just make sure to discourage anyone from feeling they have some sort of divine ownership over the land. Examples:

    Little Johnny says “This is my land!” Knock that little bugger over and say “it’s mine now.”

    If John says “God has given me this land to carry out his will!” turn that fucker into fertilizer so that he may be of use to society.

    • FastAndBulbous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      So if you spend months preparing a harvest, you’d be cool with someone turning up in the night and taking the crops after you’ve done all the hard work? After all the land wouldn’t being to you.

  • Small-scale, local farming is where it’s at. Growing a bucket of potatoes on a balcony or helping out at a community garden are small but achievable steps to bring the food closer to us. In addition to sustainability, it promotes knowledge of how to produce our own food and reduces dependence on large-scale monoculture farming.

    It’s nice to walk a few paces and pick up an ingredient for dinner with the satisfaction that you nurtured it. But mainly, I just don’t feel like going to the grocery store as much lol.

    Check out !BalconyGardening@slrpnk.net :)

    • Moghul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      I do sure wish I had a balcony. I grew peppers and cherry tomatoes on my windowsill a few years in a row but the effort isn’t worth it for an apartment…

      • I feel ya! We work with what we can and if the space you have isn’t feasible, then that’s okay if it simply doesn’t work out.

        That being said, here’s a few options to consider but do what you want. :)

        One option is to grow some herbs since those tend to get pricey and they therefore offer the best bang for your buck. Plus they take up little space. Starting from seeds is the most cost effective (only a couple dollars for 1000s of seeds). Sow them in an empty plastic egg carton, nursery pots, or other upcycled plastic container. Then, you can germinate and grow under grow lights. Don’t bother with “grow light” marketed ones. Just the brightest, whitest generic LED bulb will do. If you run it all day, it’ll only cost a couple cents per month. Then, you can harvest fresh herbs year-round! Lamps can be found for cheap and sometimes free on Facebook marketplace.

        Another option is finding a community garden in your area.

    • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think most of the things you say are true, but small local farming isn’t going to solve world hunger. The bigger a farm gets the more efficient it can operate. The progress we made as a species boils down to how much more efficient we can do stuff.

    • vsis@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I grow tomatoes in my balcony. Constructive and fulfilling activity, love it.

      But I can’t imagine eating like 15 tomatoes per year lol

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Industrial production of food is not the problem. Capitalism is.

      I mean, good for you if you want to play in a garden with plants, but I don’t want to do that. And this kind of production is not enough to feed everyone.

  • Flughoernchen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Farming basically invented work and employment. They should have realized something was not right about that back then.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It invented having a relatively reliable food surplus.

      I wish I could make all these neoprimitives actually live the life for a week so they shut up forever about it.

      • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        11 months ago

        Practically every single tribe on the planet decided that the odds for farming was better than rolling the dice every year.

        • Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think it’s more likely that it was better odds, and those that continued nomadic life died off at a much higher rate.

          • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think both of you are not considering two major aspects:

            Farming can feed more people on a given fertile area than hunting and gathering can.

            Farming is area exclusive, e.g. there is a set amount of people farming in one area and considering this area to be theirs, excluding everyone else from usage.

            It is very much possible, that in terms of providing food for the existing population both are equally viable. But with farming you could create larger more densely packed populations, which in turn provided means to exclude others by force. So while hunting and gathering was not necessarily a bad way of life, it did not allow for imperialism and was subsequently diminished by the imperialists.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Man’s never heard of the Mongols, Turks, Huns, etc etc etc.

                Whose lifestyles only worked because they could trade for food and goods from farming communities btw

                • And they existed about 2000-1000 years ago. Humans started settling and farming as far back as 10.000-12.000 years ago.

                  Of course by then populations have increased tremendously. But in the spirit of the meme that probably wasn’t the best overall course of action, was it?

            • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              So while hunting and gathering was not necessarily a bad way of life, it did not allow for imperialism and was subsequently diminished by the imperialists.

              Have you seen nowadays how they fish? They destroy whole huge areas leaving no fish behind. This is a type of imperialism. The problem is capitalism in its nature

              • And for that kind of fishing you need large vessels, built in stationary warfts, using stationary ports. The materials are made in stationary complex apparatusses to extract and shape metals from ore and the ore is mined in stationary mines.

                All of this is only possible as a result of settling

            • bouh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Hunting and gathering wasn’t peace and love. There were wars and resources access problems already. Farming is simply much more efficient. Hunting can only feed people until you reach the natural reproduction of the animals. Same for gathering and plants. Domestication and farming is the process of increasing the volume of food you can have access too. Thus you can feed more people more reliably and with less space.

              Human population on earth is directly linked to food access.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      Right, because hunting and gathering isn’t work. People just got food into their mouths doing nothing - like wild animals.

      • Flughoernchen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s a difference between working for your own and your communities good and working for someone else while not being allowed to keep your (fair share of) product/profit.

        • Provoked Gamer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s not how farming started though. They started farming so that they can feed themselves and their community. It eventually devolved into that, but it’s not how it started.

        • KaleDaddy@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Early farming would have been communally owned land. But hunter gatherer life was not remotely as relaxed as dudes on yhe Internet would make it seem

          I mean an-prim is like the dumbest ideology ever unless you actually think 50+% infant mortality and everyone who needs glasses being unable to survive is cool.

      • Roflol@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If i care for area for years, build, plant etc, someone else can come take it?

          • FastAndBulbous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            What should happen is that the people who haven’t sowed the crops could do some work in order to earn access to the crops. Then we could create some kind of system whereby people get rewarded for the work they provide with an abstract token. We could call this money and people could exchange it for goods and services.

          • Roflol@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            But you can throw people out of your community? Then some communities will be a lot better off than others

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Were I not lazy, I’d be willing to bet if I sift through their comments that I’d find something about landlords being bad.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Well, utilizing a little thing called “context clues” you can see that I’m very clearly not talking about the person I’m responding to. I’m talking about the person claiming private ownership would be better.

            My point, is the hypocrisy. But I get it, over half of America reads below a 6th grade level. Ya’ll need help getting there.

            • theangryseal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Well, you called it with me. I was denied an education so I could work and support my family.

              Horrah. Good on you. Very observant.

  • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    No! You’re looking at this the wrong way. Bisophenol A is the most affordable gender affirmation therapy in existance.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    that’s stilt houses and rice terracing. those people are gonna invent rectangular sails and fire pistons

  • etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Do you think it is possible for our current level of scientific knowledge to exist in a hunter gather society?

  • bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I find it so funny that these plastic and credit score are a problem since like 50 years but somehow farming and civilization would be responsible for it. Like capitalism is the only outcome for civilization. It’s scary how people are conditioned with this.