• booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 hours ago

      People have containerized (like literal shipping containers that comply with ISO 668 and its successors, not just software like Docker) data centers that can operate wherever they can hook up power. Put some antennas or satellite receivers on the outside, and you might be able to literally have services running from a moving vehicle or ship.

      • Inucune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Railcar. X-Files got that right. Move it across the country, tacked on the end of a freight or passenger train.

  • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I feel like bluesky is just an attempt by a lot of institutional powers that lost a platform when Elon took over Twitter to make what essentially is a clone of Twitter circa 2018.

    What a lot of people forget is that, even before Elon, Twitter had become super toxic. It was basically some pseduo-progressive echo chamber dominated by lazy journalists, virtue signaling politicians, and toxic hot takes divorced from reality. The moderation system was just selectively enforced based on whatever Twitter’s SF HQ thought was relevant that day.

    I like the idea of anyone being able to spin up their own server and have a space for discourse. While it can be dangerous, I’d strongly argue that having a centralized private organization deciding what is/isn’t acceptable is a lot more so.

    • stray@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s how forums used to be, and it worked just fine. You had to go out of your way to find communities dedicated to bigotry instead of getting forcibly pipelined into them just for joining a funny cat image group.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Kinda - the dev team was external and had already started the project when Twitter offered funding for an open protocol based version of Twitter, and selected the current team to do it (so Jack could avoid moderation duties, lol)

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Is this really how it works? Is that per year? Hosted? Or do you own the software and can host it on your own?

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        ATProto Relays, which consolidate all the data across the network into a single location. They are necessary for efficiency

        How? And the fediverse works the other way around.

        • airportline@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Basically, on ATProto, everyone stores their own data on a PDS (Personal Data Server). This includes every post, image, video, follow, like, block, etc. The relay crawls the open web for PDSs to consolidate into a single stream of data.

          From here, services can build off of that single data stream without needing to do any crawling of their own.

          Of course, this does give the operator of the relay a lot of power. If they were to block your PDS, then only services relying on a different relay can access your data. This is especially why it is important that there exist independent third-party relays, but no one has taken up the mantle yet.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The PDS design is a nice approach to making AT Proto distributed. But, the way they chose to operate relays means that the protocol requires massive investment to run.

            The absolute minimum spend for a node right now, even with Bluesky still growing, is something like tens of thousands of dollars per year. If Bluesky does become the next Twitter, it will probably be $100k+ per year to run a relay. That means a company could run a relay, maybe a university could run one, but it’s way out of the reach of anyone but the richest of individual users.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Can’t someone theoretically make an Activitypub relay which hosts information from all private instances that federate with it? Like, how is this (AT Protocol) better

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        33 minutes ago

        In addition, it’s estimated to current cost about $500 a month just to store the contents of a relay server. this doesn’t include network or computer cost. this will only get more expensive and lead to big businesses being the only players. relays, being the “Post office” of bluesky, have the power to suppress whatever they don’t like.

        ActivityPub really is “for the people”.

    • Lyre@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Honestly… Ya, literally any extra steps in signing up or slight bit of confusion is enough to make the average person give up and go back to whatever platform they are comfortable with. I’ve talked to people who dispise twitter but won’t even switch to Bluesky because the extra dot in the user handle is too weird for them.

    • Elgenzay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Does anyone actually say this though? I don’t think anyone who joined Bluesky did so for federation - they joined because it’s not Twitter.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah there’s this really weird group of people on Lemmy who are obsessed with thinking Twitter and blue sky are the exact same thing. I don’t know if it’s because they don’t get why people switch to Blue Sky or if they’re trying to purposely downplay the Nazi stuff on Twitter. I really can’t decide. Strongly leaning toward the latter.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You are on the Fediverse, a community centered primarily around free, open source, federated software watching every normie on the internet abandon one corpo playpen for another corpo playpen. Of course we’re upset about it.

          I think Bluesky is currently better than twitter, I have absolutely no faith that it will remain that way.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            This is exactly what I’m fucking talking about. Somehow hand waving away the fact that Twitter’s literally run by a Nazi promoting Nazi ideology. That’s not the same fucking thing as Blue Sky. To say so is bizarre. To play down that difference is bizarre. To act like it’s inevitably going to end up in the exact same place is bizarre.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Founder Jack Dorsey has abandoned Bluesky citing a lack of continued faith in the project and current CEO Jay Graber has primarily worked with cryptocurrency. My hopes are not high. Besides which, even if they do everything right and gain a huge following, Musk or Zuckerberg will just want to buy them out and our current government will allow them to do that.

              Not being literal Nazis is definitely a mark in their favor, but the whole point of this argument in the first place is that free, open source, self hosted federated software is RIGHT HERE. We’re on it RIGHT NOW. With everyone abandoning major platforms because they’re full of Nazis, this is perhaps the single best opportunity we’re ever going to have to retake the internet for ourselves en masse. Which everyone is totally ignoring in favor of hopping onto the next corponet.

              I’m not excusing Musk for shit, and I’m not accusing Bluesky of being as bad or worse than Nazis. That’s silly. I’d rather see users move to Bluesky than stay on X. But I’d much rather see them move to Mastodon. Corporations at large, especially social media corps have proven time and again that they can’t be trusted, so… don’t. Take back your own internet. The options are here already.

        • SatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Possible it’s that. Could just be they hate that general format of twitter/bluesky for social media. I lump them together because I’d never use either. No clue on the actual populaces on them.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I joined because it lets me use my domain as my username without having to host an instance.

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Mastodon instances keep deactivating my accounts when I don’t post anything for two weeks, so yeah. Bsky it is.

      • Elgenzay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think that’s standard. I’m on mastodon.social where I haven’t posted in forever and it’s still there

  • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The Internet is just a fad. Wait until everyone logs into a single central server in Virginia. One database is all you need for Earth.

  • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I think that what a lot of people don’t realize is that BlueSky is federated in order to make their corporate infrastructure stronger and easier for them to operate.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Ah yes, the tragedy of any federation, most people don’t want to pay attention to every little thing in their lives so when one central node becomes “good enough” it’s easiest to relinquish control for as long as it works.

    I can think of one very large federation experiment in the world that went the same way.

    Hell, lemmy.world is already the defacto way to engage here.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ll take three!

    What I am unsure about is whether this is a BS or AT thing. There are people expressing interest in using AT to make versions of other popular services (like TikTok, Instagram, etc) but would they face similar costs to run a relay? If so, and it would mean you either need VC or charity backing (millionaires either way), I fail to see the point when we already have everything chugging along here on AP - with an investment of a fraction of that money we could make on-boarding slicker and help iron out other niggles that occur when you are developing on a shoestring.

    • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      24 hours ago

      There are people expressing interest in using AT to make versions of other popular services (like TikTok, Instagram, etc) but would they face similar costs to run a relay

      Most non-Bluesky App Views I know about (WhiteWind, frontpage.fyi, BookHive) just use BlueSky’s.

      I fail to see the point when we already have everything chugging along here on AP - with an investment of a fraction of that money we could make on-boarding slicker and help iron out other niggles that occur when you are developing on a shoestring.

      You’re failing to consider how this would benefit the shareholders! My portfolio line must go up!

    • ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      As I understand it, it’s kind of both.

      The Bsky Relay costs are because it’s the primary relay, sure, but any relay aiming to handle a mass amount of people, as well as a variety of AppViews, will likely scale similarly in costs. This is because to try to minimize any fragmentation of experience (as one may see with ActivityPub), AT protocol relays act as a central mirror of all the personal data servers connecting to them.

      It’s baked into the architecture for the most part, despite some later developments of lighter pseudo-relays that try to reduce some of the overhead. From the outset they’ve said they only really see there being a few large-scale relays due to the operational costs.