Visual Studio and VS Code are two separate products, I’m afraid. Visual Studio is a .NET IDE and build tool, as opposed to VS Code which is essentially an extensible text editor.
Edit: also the screenshot looks like it might be from Slack?
There was almost one but then Xitter nuked their public API which makes it almost impossible, from memory. They knew this would happen, and they did everything they could to stop it.
When you think about it, where else would you get The Blade of The Lich King, but a raid?
Congrats on expressing that in the most passive-agressive and gatekeepery way you could’ve. I’ve been using Linux for the better part of a decade now, and know my way around the usr dir - however things work a bit different on NixOS, whose package manager doesn’t involve installation steps beyond adding the word “helix” to my packages list. I’m not great at reading though, so I absolutely would’ve missed something as obvious as the Installation page 😅
As for your beliefs about postmodern Vim clones, what’s the point (and fun) in the freedom of choice Linux offers if I can’t install and try out the latest fun spin on an old fave from time to time?
Ooh, I’ll keep that in mind for next time, thanks!
Helix Editor did this to me. They have so much documentation on their site about how to use the editor, how to extend it, theme it, etc., etc. What they didn’t seem to document, though, is that the binary is named hx, not helix :/
If you swap “girl” for “Klingon” this is 100% something a Klingon would say - probably Worf after facing another bout of “YoU wErE rAiSeD bY hUmAnS uR nOt A tRuE kLiNgOn”
Misread this as petaQ and I’m living for the image of a Klingon swearing at somebody because they don’t understand a “human” joke 😂
Ah great, that could be why a bunch of my photos didn’t get metadata. I’ll look into that, thanks for the tip.
Ooh, might look into that instead, actually. I always love a reason to write myself a little tool, but dealing with Google’s bull makes it much less appealing to me when existing tools can do it for me.
Just gone through this whole process myself. My god does it suck. Another thing you’ll want to be aware of around Takeout with Google Photos is that the photo metadata isn’t attached as EXIF like with a normal service, but rather it’s given as an accompanying JSON file for each image file. I’m using Memories for Nextcloud, and it has a tool that can restore the EXIF metadata using those files, but it’s not exact and now I have about 1.5k images tagged as being from this year when they’re really from 2018 or before. I’m looking at writing my own tool to restore some of this metadata but it’s going to be a right pain in the ass.
All hours of the day, all hours of the night, my life is interrupted by PISS!
(Vaguely NSFW sauce) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrBJDvPZf2g
Here I was trying to figure out which Cardassian had committed treason (trees on Kardashian) :/
Such a shame YTPs went out of fashion - this would be a great YTP.
To an extent, things like “baby want milk?” also help with language acquisition. We could say “would my baby like to have a drink of milk?”, and that would give exposure to a lot more vocabulary early on, but it also uses much more complex grammar and abstract concepts like “would”, whereas the former phrase uses only a subject, an object, and a verb which corresponds to a thing that the baby can easily conceptualize because they “feel” it (the feeling of wanting something). It’s similar to learning a language later in life - you usually start with things like “I am a boy” or “This cat likes fish”, rather than “My good sir could you please enunciate better so that I might understand your foreign tongue”, because it helps our brains take on the basic “shapes” and “sounds” of the language, which make learning the more complex and abstract parts easier later. As for why people do it with pets, who aren’t learning a language? Idk, I guess small cute thing kicks the baby instinct into gear whether it’s human or not 😂
I feel like you’re viewing this from the wrong angle, or at very least we’re viewing it from different angles. You seem to be doing a binary classification (Is this plant edible) rather than a group classification (what plant is this?) where edibility is an attribute of the plant to be returned to the user (yes; no; when green; only the roots; etc.) - the latter is the approach most of these apps take, classify the image into a species (or list of potential species) then give the user details such as identifying features, common growing areas, edibility, and lookalikes. You’re right about softmax, it’s been a couple of years since I’ve done the programming side of this so my terminology is a bit rusty.
This is blatantly false. Classification tasks like this all have a level of certainty for each possible category - it’s just up to the person writing the software to interpret those levels of certainty in a way that’s useful to the user. Whether this is saying “I don’t know” when the certainties are too spread out, or providing a list of options like other people in this thread have said their apps do. The problem is that “100% certainty” comes off well with the general public, so there’s a financial incentive to make the system seem more certain than it is by using a layer (from memory it’s called Softmax?) that will return only the category with the highest degree of certainty.
Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start furiously masturbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the police”. I dropped my phone and everyone around me saw this image. Now there is a whole train of men masturbating together at this one image. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this post NSFW.