• 0 Posts
  • 60 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 18th, 2023

help-circle









  • Encryption doesn’t protect you from being identified. Encryption prevents eavesdropping unto the connection from a third party. DMCA lawyers don’t need to do that to identify you as a seeder. All they need to do is request the content from you, watch you send to them, and make a record of your ip address.

    The blacklist, maybe protects you. No idea. Though it can easily be circumvented by a motivated group.



  • Use http://grayjay.app

    EDIT: I’m fascinated by the childishness of those who are complaining about the $10. Not only you don’t have to pay it, and not only that it’s open source, and not only the intentions are clear on why it’s not a permissive license made to fight filling average Joe with malware like always being done with NewPipe and others on Play Store, but also you can pick your poison. Would you like google to win this dumb war on ad blockers? Or would you like to support non-perfect people making FOSS apps for your benefit? I really don’t get you, guys. Pick your battles! Take the win and shut up for once!



  • Devouring@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mleat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah… right. People will stop being lazy even though they can be, and will just work day and night to benefit others. Very convincing. I’ve seen all kinds of people who were put in cushy cushion jobs for decades and didn’t learn shit. Never heard of boomers?

    Under capitalism, you can do the bare minimum, but a job cut will always hit you first if you make yourself worthless to the company. Is it perfect? No. But the incentive is clear, at least.


  • Devouring@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mleat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Until everyone fights what “rights” are, which is kind of the problem everywhere. You have a picture of these rights, which are pink and rosy. I believe you have good intention. But you have to imagine an contentious environment where everyone will disagree with you to maximize their gain, and minimize their effort. Any system you put in place and anything you define as rights will be malleable and will be up for thousands of debates, and eventually you’ll be the dictator for setting up a system that you think will work. Back to square one.

    This is why I said it’s opinion. I got my answer. You agree with firing people. Good enough for me for now. Others don’t.


  • Devouring@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mleat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well, I don’t think you can use written laws to fight human plans to centralize power. I guess our current system is proof of that. People will always find a way to centralize that power to benefit themselves and their groups.

    But anyway. I guess we’re getting into a dead end. This is becoming opinion stuff at this point, whether this will work. I’ll have to think more about this stuff.


  • Devouring@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mleat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Humans will be humans wherever they go.

    But to summarize. You basically want to wreck the current system on the basis that everyone will be diligent, reading all the time, just for the “greater good”, more so than their own profit.

    And btw, about the “bare minimum”. No one has a reason to not do the bare minimum as they don’t get fired (consequences). There will always be the lazy guy who does the bare minimum, and everyone will get lazier because they’ll get jealous with zero consequences.


  • Devouring@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mleat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because the fraction of the current world that reads every day and learns every day is extremely small. Again, like I said before, how many people around you come back from work and want to read technical books and watch courses instead of chilling, or hanging out with friends? I have two friends who are nut jobs like me and work all the time. EVERYONE else is lazy and just wants to have fun after work, and that’s in my circle. This spans over decades in the different jobs and sectors I worked at, in different countries. Do you have a different experience around you? I have trouble convincing people to read for 30 minutes every day.

    Are you trying to argue that the majority of people watch educational videos in their free time and read technical books and prefer that over hanging out?


  • Devouring@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mleat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Agreed. It’s a nepotism problem. I’m just drawing the picture that removing money from the picture basically makes relationships the new currency. It’s basically how life used to be a long time ago, and those who were closer to the leader got better jobs with perks. People will always find a way to benefit and will centralize power eventually. I can’t say much about hypotheticals and whether your coop will fix that, but in my opinion, history suggests that we’ll just end up with a new system of power.


  • Devouring@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mleat the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    OK, at least we agree we can fire people. That answers my question. The circumstances aren’t important. This idea that people can’t be fired is just ridiculous.

    Do you think communities will be happy seeing their friends/family being fired, and not understanding why? This actually reminds me of the movie Casino (1995), where Robert De Niro fires that Texan guy for incompetence, and then hell breaks loose due to relatives not understanding how that works. This is human nature. People will always prefer to keep an incompetent relative vs firing them for a good reason, no matter what.