I’m mostly half-serious.

  • 507 Posts
  • 1K Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2023

help-circle



  • balderdash@lemmy.zipOPtomemes@lemmy.worldThis shit is getting ridiculous
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I never said we should have zero debt, that’s a strawman. Most economist recommend a moderate amount of debt due to various positive effects (some of which you mention). So the real disagreement comes here:

    It’s all connected and that’s why running a deficit, a (relatively) small one, is a good thing.

    The implication being that you think the U.S. has a (relatively) small amount of debt. Now, I am willing to be convinced otherwise, but I do not think that the U.S. currently has a small amount of debt. Our debt to GDP ratio is higher than other developed nations, which is concerning.

    I do concede that we aren’t in danger of a debt crisis on the scale of Greece or Sri Lanka. But ~$34 Trillion in debt needs to be part of the discussion when we keep praising the economy.






















  • balderdash@lemmy.ziptoMemes@sopuli.xyzChad Diogenes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    The argument makes less sense outside of it’s context. Moore was responding to the skeptical position that we’re all in a simulation. Moore argues that this skeptical argument undermines itself: all of the language, terms and concepts which form the simulation argument are based on the sensory experience that the argument would effectively dismiss. Furthermore, any argument that we’re in a simulation is epistemologically on a par with the argument that we’re not. Therefore we should have less confidence in the skeptical argument than the common sense conclusion that we have hands.