supposed “civilians”
Children? Seriously?
supposed “civilians”
Children? Seriously?
Your comment is painful to read.
Most I understand but the opposition to “wearing clothes made from animal fur” seems a little misinformed.
Where do they think wool comes from?
I had a similar reaction to this post title. Firstly, don’t give up. That’s the most important thing.
If you haven’t already, I’d highly recommend seeking out psychological treatment. Your attitude is not necessarily novel but a strong indicator that it may be helpful.
If you don’t “click” with the first person you see, don’t be afraid to find another.
I’d probably turn off the power first especially if I didn’t already know what was behind it and whether it is properly grounded.
Sorry, all you get is images of a maxi pad to indicate enormous damage for what was likely a graze.
An attempt on a former president’s life is a big deal, whether I think he’s a human dumpster fire or not.
However, the way he played this up was and is ridiculous. He didn’t need to prove anything. Someone shot at him and that’s not in doubt. Instead he chose to milk it and I personally find that ludicrous given the circumstances.
It won’t matter. His supporters will just ignore anything they disagree with. It won’t even be reported in the media they consume.
Pro birth, not pro life.
I agree with most of these but there’s another missing benefit. A lot of the time my colleagues will be iterating on a PR so commits of “fuck, that didn’t work, maybe this” are common.
I like meaningful commit messages. IMO “fixed the thing” is never good enough. I want to know your intent when I’m doing a blame in 18 months time. However, I don’t expect anyone’s in progress work to be good before it hits main. You don’t want those comments in the final merge, but a squash or rebase is an easy way to rectify that.
Not just cyclists, but yes. The males become very protective of their offspring in breeding season.
A lot of aus cyclists go as far as to tie zip ties on their helmets such that the tails stick out like bird spikes when the right time of year hits.
I feel like I’m the exact opposite of what this article proposed however the entire thing confuses me.
I’m not rich but relatively well off, and, without doubt in the best financial position of my immediate group of friends.
If I happen to be the one that picks up the bill I often have people chasing me to pay me. I actually think that is a problem because they feel obliged to do the right thing, however I’m unmotivated because I don’t care about the outcome – I don’t need the money. This is my fault and I feel poorly for it but the reality is that after I’ve had a nice evening I don’t really care. In terms of the debt: honestly I probably wouldn’t bother asking.
The very concept of asking someone for 4 bucks seems abhorrent to me. To be clear, I say this personally; I’m not struggling to pay rent/mortgage/utilities/whatever. If you’re in a position where those are concerns then please absolutely follow up.
Chasing a $4 debt won’t make you rich, ever. Even if you do it all the time. Anyone well off chasing this kind of cash is deluding themselves.
Generally speaking my friends and I operate over a long term fairness principle. “Bob got the last round, I’ll get the next”; they won’t be even but our assumption is that it’ll balance in the long term. That applies to more than just the pub.
So, uh, a modern (not US) prison cell?
I’d prefer they make it fatter if the battery would last more than a day as consequence.
A former treasurer of Australia solved it. You just need to get a good job.
Yes.
Legitimate question: is there no benefit to voting for a party if they won’t win?
Do they get any future election funding or… anything?
I realise the US uses FPTP, but can someone explain to me why this comment is being downvoted? I’d think participating in the democratic process would be considered a good thing regardless.
Raising tax revenue and funding some variation of single payer health care or socialised medicine are not mutually exclusive.
Anti-depressants.