KPIX/CBS News Bay Area, KCBS Radio and the San Francisco Examiner host this San Francisco Mayoral Debate at the Julia Morgan Ballroom on California Street on...
Mark Ferrell did the most finger pointing. It’s a shame London Breed didn’t participate because I’d like to hear her goals for another term. I learned more about all of these candidates.
I wish the moderation format would have been that every candidate answered the same question so I could hear clearer comparison of their differences.
Certainly Farrell didn’t help himself IMO. His rose tinted glasses about his entire 6 months in office wore thin. He could have given the late Mayor Lee whose 6 years in office he finished some credit at least.
Peskin came across as a total NIMBY, which is what he is.
Safai and, as I said, Lurie impressed me the most, but neither of them have a realistic chance of winning.
Who do you think “won”?
I was impressed with Daniel Lurie. He struck me as a Peter Ueberroth/gets-things-done type.
Mark Farrell says his SF was wonderful and paradise, when he was only mayor for 6 months.
I didn’t feel like anyone “won” - Do you?
Mark Ferrell did the most finger pointing. It’s a shame London Breed didn’t participate because I’d like to hear her goals for another term. I learned more about all of these candidates.
I wish the moderation format would have been that every candidate answered the same question so I could hear clearer comparison of their differences.
Certainly Farrell didn’t help himself IMO. His rose tinted glasses about his entire 6 months in office wore thin. He could have given the late Mayor Lee whose 6 years in office he finished some credit at least.
Peskin came across as a total NIMBY, which is what he is.
Safai and, as I said, Lurie impressed me the most, but neither of them have a realistic chance of winning.