You call out Russia or China, MLs think if they regurgitate “read theory” that solves my issues with them.

You call out American liberals and how they aid fascists, you’re calling a secret Trump supporter.

You say that genocide is an evil action, liberals and Tankies will defend their favorite country’s actions because you’re a shill for the enemy if you do.

You say America did something kinda good, you’re somehow a neolib in disguise. You lightly praise the USSR, you’re Stalin’s second cousin as an AI.

I just don’t want people harmed by a government force. Fuck me, I guess? I feel like I’m taking crazy pills for applying the same morals to every politician and country, even ones I live in or slightly like.

Edit: If someone said it was annoying being an leftist and a bunch of liberals came in exusing their actions and doubling down, everyone would be singing a different tune. Just kinda fascinating.

  • BonerMan
    14·
    2 months ago

    Liberal is just used as a dog whistle in USA language it doesn’t have meaning anymore.

    • within_epsilon@beehaw.org
      21·
      2 months ago

      Liberal being a dog whistle is equivalent to Anarchy being a dog whistle. If words lack meaning there is nothing to discuss.

      • BonerMan
        12·
        2 months ago

        Oh the word doesn’t lack meaning, US people just verbally rape the word as a dog whistle.

        • within_epsilon@beehaw.org
          2·
          2 months ago

          I can agree that the current usage imparts more effort during conversation to establish a consensus of definitions. My hypothesis is that the effort for that establishment scales non-polynomially.

          I wonder if there is research on how many people can walk away from a conversation with consensus of definitions. My guess is less than 20.