• PapaStevesy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s really an error of article choice for the title, it should be “Scientists Just Recreated a Chemical Reaction…”

      • flooppoolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, I gave it a skim as I am quite familiar with the topic. Kudos to them. I personally subscribe to the what the Miller-Urey experiment shows, which is that amino acids were formed first and that basic molecules came later through enzymes.

        It’s hard to believe how much of an energy differential was overcome and self replicating molecules just formed somewhere vs just having high entropy molecules to start with through lightning and primordial soup.

        We would have new life popping up all the time don’t you think?

        • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          We would have new life popping up all the time don’t you think?

          Depends. You’d have to have the right soup, and the right environmental conditions to make the the relevant reactions probable.

          If those conditions exist currently, those proto-life fragments would probably need to be in niches devoid of life, as they wouldn’t be able to compete/survive with DNA based lifeforms around.

          • flooppoolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No doubt about that. This is basically different flavors of atheism lol.

            The argument is did amino acids come first, or did the molecules that make up amino acids find an incredibly rare way to line up and form all the various different amino acids?

            A theory about lightning hitting the pools of water and ammonia forming amino acids directly is what I believe to be the true cause of life.

            The other theory (outlined in the article) is based on a much older chemical reaction that heavily relies on autocatalysis in which near perfect conditions are required.

            But in whole, I don’t know, nobody knows. We will fade in to dust and never be sure why we really even existed to begin with.

    • flooppoolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also this type of research is a real chicken and egg scenario. No one wins because no one knows.

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess a mix of water, carbon, ammonia, lime, phosphorus, salt, saltpeter, sulfur, fluorine, iron, silicon and trace amounts of fifteen other elements

  • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because that’s what we need right now.

    Can’t wait for the rich and powerful to have the ability to survive global catastrophe off the backs of people they’ll leave behind for more loyal subjects.