• zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 年前

    I’m okay with being charged a monthly subscription for something that has an ongoing cost, like mobile data. So long as I can still hotspot my phone and access ‘premium connectivity’ features over wifi, that is.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      Yeah about those ‘premium connectivity features’… one of them is warning you that the road you’re about to drive on has a traffic jam. And no, you can’t have it use your phone’s internet connection and you also can’t do CarPlay or Android Auto.

      For me real time traffic isn’t a premium feature or an ad on. It’s table stakes. And it should be free. Worse, not having it already almost makes your car hard to sell secondhand. Imagine what it’ll be like several years ago when people start selling Rivians?

      • BirdsWithBeefyArms@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 年前

        I agree, I do think they should allow both aa/cp, and wifi while driving so you can tether to your phones wifi. I’m not as doom about secondhand sales as you seem to be though.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        It’s not just the mobile data that’s spendy, it’s the API calls to the vendor(s) they’re getting that data from.

        Android Auto/Car Play would be nice, but having used both, the native Tesla nav is better.