• Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    E-fuels or hydrogen made from green energy. With the latter you won’t even give up on the future being EVs. They are the actually sustainable forms of transportation that everyone can accept.

    • WallEx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      … But they are way more inefficient then batteries, which is what I’ve been saying all this time.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Which doesn’t matter, something I’ve been saying all this time.

        And the efficiency of batteries has been massively exaggerated too.

        • WallEx@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          energy prices are far from stable and efficiency plays a huge role in the feasibility of a technology.

          The efficiency of e fuels is far below hydrogen and hydrogen is still a lot worse than battery.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            The advantages of a chemical fuel is that you make them when costs are very low and save them for when you need them. Even months later if need be. Not doable with batteries. Even the ICCT is admitting that electricity used to make hydrogen is going to much cheaper than electricity used to charge BEVs. It will likely be cheaper to operate a hydrogen car due to that fact.

            At least with e-fuels, there’s an argument to be made that there are too many unnecessary steps and that costs will be high. But with hydrogen, that argument doesn’t really hold water. Fuel cell cars are also EVs. The gap between BEVs FCEVs on efficiency is small and shrinking. When the full lifecycle factors are included, it is likely the FCEV is the more efficient idea even now.

            • WallEx@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Hm, maybe, but using it in a vehicle doesn’t sound too enticing. Although everything we talk about here is developing technologies, maybe the next breakthrough might change everything.