Hellfire103@sopuli.xyz to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 7 months agoWATERsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1574arrow-down121
arrow-up1553arrow-down1imageWATERsopuli.xyzHellfire103@sopuli.xyz to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-27 months ago roughly 2.5 times the hydrogen vs oxygen to account for inefficiencies Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoI’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react
Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
I’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react