• Doctor xNo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Infinite, just like 0, actually has no - or +. So yes and no. For all intents and purposes -inf == inf.

      • Doctor xNo@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I suggest you Google “Projectively Extended Real Numbers”.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You mean this one?

          The projectively extended real number line is distinct from the affinely extended real number line, in which +∞ and −∞ are distinct.

          Now tell me, do we usually work with the projectively extended real numbers?

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      One positive infinity doesn’t even necessarily equal another positive infinity, as two expressions might not approach infinity at the same rate. Note the word “approach”. That’s the only way you’re allowed to use infinity/-infinity, by approaching it. It’s not a real number, it doesn’t actually exist. Second, in most contexts (calculus) it strictly refers to magnitude (ie, it can have directionality applied to it). Take a calculus class if you want to learn more.