• CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The technology is reportedly ten times cheaper than lithium-ion batteries and far more powerful and efficient than any other thermal battery.

        Which isn’t saying much, really. It exposes “solar” cells to the white hot bricks to regain the energy, but that’s going to be maybe 30% efficient. It also uses tin as the heating fluid, at least in the prototype, which is (in spite of popular confusion) a very rare metal.

        It’s an interesting idea, but I doubt this is going anywhere. Even pumped water or solid weights seems more practical, and sodium ion battery is apparently coming on the market as an option.

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          yeah that is along the lines I was thinking when reading it. heat it to super high but then collect it as light. does not sound efficient.

          • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Heat in general seems like the shittiest way to store electricity. The real application there is when you wanted heat anyway, like that cement plant (I think?) in Finland that keeps a tower superheated with renewables and then blows air through it into the kiln.

              • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                It is, although capturing the CO2 that is generated by the chemical creation of dry concrete is probably an even harder problem in that specific case.