• CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you can’t get sex from being a cool person and you have to pay for it, that’s sad. If you’re addicted to sex and pay for it because you need sex is even sadder.

        • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          People who pay for sex are not universally “not cool people” who can’t get it other ways. In my work with various at risk populations, from what I hear from sex workers, plenty of people pay for sex. Funny charismatic, rich, doesn’t matter, they’re just as likely to be Johns.

              • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s generally how it’s been done in America for hundreds of years. I think peasants in Europe did it like that even further back too. So how long until it can be considered “tradition”?

                  • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Rich families married for power, peasants married for love. That’s pretty much how it’s always been. Lmao do you think people who worked on a lords farm was also worrying about who their daughter could marry to get a leg up? That’s ridiculous