dantheclamman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWhy you shouldn't use Brave Browserwww.spacebar.newsexternal-linkmessage-square857fedilinkarrow-up11.92Karrow-down1263cross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up11.66Karrow-down1external-linkWhy you shouldn't use Brave Browserwww.spacebar.newsdantheclamman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square857fedilinkcross-posted to: firefox@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squareMubelotix@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoSo it’s ok to not fix it? I agee with original commenter. Firefox is full of bugs, particularly in dev tools, which renders it unusable for me
minus-squareAggressivelyPassive@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·1 year agoEvery software has old bugs, that’s perfectly normal. The question is how relevant these bugs are for the average customer. If a bug only affects 12 people among the millions of users, it’s not that relevant.
minus-squaredbilitated@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoas a dev, we close bugs with a set SLA. 15 years is … well, it’s outside that.
So it’s ok to not fix it? I agee with original commenter. Firefox is full of bugs, particularly in dev tools, which renders it unusable for me
Every software has old bugs, that’s perfectly normal. The question is how relevant these bugs are for the average customer.
If a bug only affects 12 people among the millions of users, it’s not that relevant.
as a dev, we close bugs with a set SLA.
15 years is … well, it’s outside that.