• blujan@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    He is wrong tho, natural substances can and are regularly patented when a use is found for them or a production method that’s better is discovered.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Monsanto has entered the chat.

      DNA shouldn’t be patentable. I guarantee you that the scenario that Micheal Crichton laid out in Next will end up happening at some point unless we reign this shit in.

    • jon@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was my initial reaction at first as well. However as far as I can tell, natural products are not patentable, unless the product in question has been modified, manipulated etc, to produce something that is deemed to have been significantly changed.

      So, in the US, for example, the Supreme Court ruled that human DNA, being a naturally occurring product, cannot be patented. However, it also ruled that complementary DNA, essentially DNA that has been extracted and then modified in a lab, can be patented.