I’m talking in the context of the “capitalist rules”. If you say the aforementioned sentence, you remove the responsibility of the player by dismissing the fact that the winner makes the rules.

PS: Doesn’t work for every context: if the player aims to change the rules because he doesn’t like them, he might see winning as a way to change them. “You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain” I guess…

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, but it was OP’s example. Use it in any ither context, and I’ll tell you why the player is also a shitty person, regardless of the game.

      Is it a guy being emotionally manipulative to have relationships with multiple women? Yeah, he’s a shitbag.

      Is it a business resorting to underhanded, but profitable, practices to corner the market and boost income? Shitbags.

      Is it the kid cheesing that one move to win every battle? Shit. Bag.

      I mean, there are degrees of being a shitty person. But anyone saying “don’t hate the player, hate the game,” knows they are doing something shitty and are doing it anyway because they can.