In our previous announcement, we announced that we closed downvotes.

Some people found it right, some people hated it, some people hesitated. At the end of the day, since we are on a disorganised platform like fediverse, I find the decision we took right. However, I was also annoyed by the lack of downvotes. So I searched for a solution.

I think the planned post flair support will be a good improvement in this regard. But it seems to take a long time to develop.

What do you think about limiting downvotes to only members of that community? I see it as the optimal way in the current situation.

Please vote with empathy, not just as a user, but assuming you are a poster user. Is it right decision?

Poll: https://strawpoll.com/DwyoDBooDnA

Result: done.

    • rustling_leaves@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Downvotes should be reserved for things like spam, links that lead to malware, posts that are off-topic, etc. Things that mods would normally remove.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Downvotes are for down-voting. The entire idea is to give feedback. You are positing that it’s only meant for cruft, when the entire is for unliked content, hence, a downvote.

        If I show up in the thread and start posting puke pics, I expect downvotes being the compass to telling me where I’m not welcome.

        You’re saying that all content should be welcome, unless it’s for the silo reference you mentioned. Disagree. If you’re being downvoted, this might not be your crowd. Your assertion certainly says so.