• Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They are lurid but low quality and would be difficult but not impossible to mistake for actual photographs. They seem to be relying on football-themed body paint to work around the image generators safety features that prevent nudes from being produced. Somewhat convincing nipples and/or buttocks are sometimes visible, suggestive facial expressions, posture and positioning with other figures do most of the heavy lifting in producing these “erotic” images but I’ve seen nothing beyond that. It’s more nude caricature than pornography. They are more than a little goofy looking.

    • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just saw it, assumed smth much worse with all the talk. Theres been better deepfakes for years. This wasnt even particularly photorealistic. But they do have a derogatory undertone to em.

      • Amanduh@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Idk what you guys saw but i saw her sucking not just human cock but dog cock as well lmao

        • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah no I didn’t see anything with penetration, it was all pretty amateur level tinkering looking shit. Apparently the other poster found the stronger stuff though, yikes