BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoAI chatbots tend to choose violence and nuclear strikes in wargameswww.newscientist.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1222arrow-down126file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmygrad.mlfuturology@futurology.todaynottheonion@lemmy.world
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkAI chatbots tend to choose violence and nuclear strikes in wargameswww.newscientist.comBlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square59fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmygrad.mlfuturology@futurology.todaynottheonion@lemmy.world
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·10 months agoA human brain can do that for 20 watt of power. chatGPT uses up to 20 megawatt.
minus-squarefishos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down3·10 months agoYeah, and a car uses more energy than me. It still goes faster. What’s your point? The debate isn’t input vs output. It’s only about output(the ability of the AI).
A human brain can do that for 20 watt of power. chatGPT uses up to 20 megawatt.
Yeah, and a car uses more energy than me. It still goes faster. What’s your point? The debate isn’t input vs output. It’s only about output(the ability of the AI).