Election campaign no excuse for ‘playing with the security of the alliance,’ Poland’s defence minister says

  • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Europe absolutely should be capable of defending itself from a third rate military like Russia, but the security guarantees were related to not invading them, not defending them from invasion unless nuclear weapons were used.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

    Further, while the EU has pledged significant humanitarian support, the military support has come almost entirely from America, though Germany deserves credit for their own notable contributions, especially considering the numbers on per capita basis.

    https://www.statista.com/chart/28489/ukrainian-military-humanitarian-and-financial-aid-donors/

    • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Looks like they should have kept the nukes and that the message to the rest of the world too now, without nukes you have no guarantees to independance.

      As for the military aid I’m sure the US sent the most but the price tag attached is pretty sussy. The US mostly sent equipment that was too old and was going to be decommissioned anyways but looks like the prices for equipment cited was for brand new equipment. That equipment would most likely fetch 1/30 of it’s cited price if otherwise sold. Also the US military often counted the price of new equipment to replace the one sent over as part of the aid cost.