I already see the commends and only have one question, why are Linux users so fucking dum? countless people enjoy KDE, countless enjoy Gnome and others prefer Cinnamon or Pantheon, can’t we agree to say which we like/don’t like whenever it’s relevant rather than trash on the other DEs every time the name pops up?..
People that didn’t grow up mentally and continue their Xbox vs. PlayStation trash talk from their childhood.
Surely you mean Sega vs Nintendo
deleted by creator
Paper beats rock so the superior choice is clear.
true, they need to shut up and accept that people have different use cases
Someone here used many words to try to convince me that I was incapable of good decision making and therefore owed him and the thread an apology for saying that I liked debloated OS installs while also liking GNOME.
Gnome is the default on many important distro, but it is not flexible. A default DE has to fit to most people.
The way I see it, gnome is friendly enough to use that new users who don’t care about its flexibility will continue using it without issues while people who are bothered by the lack of flexibility are knowledgeable enough to change their DE or install a spin of the distro with their favourite DE
Most people just want a browser and a word processor plus simple spreadsheets once in a blue moon. For extremely simple and popular use cases many distros already work okayish OOTB, including those with GNOME DE.
While I absolutely don’t like GNOME and its design principles (prefer KDE), but I can see why it works for many people.
Now, for anything but the most popular use cases, that’s a whole different story altogether. I just spent the whole weekend installing and reinstalling every imaginable flavour or Arch and OpenSUSE and trying to get Hyprland or KDE to work on my NVIDIA gpu without issues and failing, then trying to stop my screen from flickering like a drowning sailor desperately trying to Morse code and SOS while on Alder Lake iGPU, and failed too. Two hours ago I wiped for what seemed like the 420th time and went crawling back to W11.
While GNOME 44.3 was skipped for some reason
Skipped by who? I’m running 44.3 right now
Edit: it was a tagged release on their gitlab too
Maybe he meant his distro skipped it. I’m also on the latest. :)
I can’t be the only one who couldn’t care less about Epiphany. I have zero faith behind a completely random browser that’s just made on the side. What’s the point, who is it for? Firefox beats it on like every use case scenario. Waste of dev time imo.
They think for open web, like what KHTML did in the past. Ends up being safari
Why is the image showing a non official panel ? Have they added that as an option?
To have that layout, I have installed several extensions. Will I need no extensions to achieve that result in GNOME 44.4?
Or is this some random pic that they grabbed without thinking about it?
Yes yes that all goo and what but does this mean the file pick will finally show thumbnails, and will that feature roll out distros?
deleted by creator
One more version trying to rethink what was long figured out by others :D
You think we have reached the ultimate desktop experience?
For a keyboard and mouse yes.
The ultimate desktop would be something like: KDE’s usability in terms of a bottom bar, notification area and menu (or ArcMenu and Dash to Panel under GNOME) + the design consistency of GNOME + optional desktop icons + window switching like Apple’s old Exposé or the current Windows Task View (Win+Tab).
Windows got one thing (almost) right, fast and snappy multitasking and that’s about it. GNOME adds long animations and takes the focus from the applications to itself - it become the “center of user’s attention”. This isn’t good, a DE should be almost invisible, as minimalistic as it can be so the user can quickly switch between windows and get their job done specially on smaller screens. I guess most people run/enjoy GNOME never touched Apple’s old Exposé (macos Tiger and before?) or the current Windows Task View (Win+Tab) thus aren’t aware how far and how productive they can be on a very small screen with a simple way to move around.
deleted by creator
@Bogasse@lemmy.world and @Gutless2615@ttrpg.network just to make my position clear, I hate KDE and all it’s design inconsistency but they actually got a better bottom bar / notifications area. GNOME designs things well but they kinda kill it all with their backwards approach and total refusal to have basic desktop functionality.
KDE looks and feels like ass.
Well, let’s be polite and say it’s not for everyone. TCB13 isn’t the only person to really love this DE 😛
I don’t get the enthousiasm either, there is always to much information for me on the screen and inconsistent UI all over the place 🤷
Yes 😀 But at least they don’t outright refuse to have basic desktop functionality. GNOME has good UI while KDE has good UX.
Gnome was nothing but terrible for me. Lacking of very basic features and many apps, including the freaking file explorer, would constantly crash. I cannot fathom how people use this garbage. Really made me appreciate KDE even more.
Really? I haven’t had any issues. What was wrong with the file explorer.
That being said, my system is base Fedora plus a few extensions.
I’ve had a thread listing most short term issues here: https://kbin.social/m/linux/t/152231/Nobara-Gnome-is-just-a-terrible-experience
For the file explorer it mostly boiled down to the fact that every time I searched something, which is mandatory since it does not have a “jump to” feature, it would very likely crash.
You were using a niche distro maintained by a single person and encountered problems? Shocking.
To be fair, I used Nobara myself for a bit until I got tired of suffering from the problems GE was creating himself. But regardless, experience on something like Nobara is not a fair way to evaluate Gnome. Try it on actual Fedora or something else mainstream that isn’t constantly fuckering around with all kinds of shit and breaking stuff.
I’m not sure what he could’ve done that affected the file explorer to such a degree? And obviously that was just one extreme example of many other problems I had. I don’t think he removed basic functionalities that I require, I am pretty sure that’s just Gnome being so hell bent on being puristic that they just don’t ship with it, which breaks my workflow entirely without offering any sort of replacement steps.
And if his stuff breaks so much, why does KDE just works? I only have / had two issues since then. First one was that Dolphin just crashed instantly, which was a known Dolphin bug and required me to manually create the thumbnail folder. The second is the inability to drag & drop out of Firefox, like my finished downloads can’t be dragged into a folder anymore - and I know this was a feature from my previous distros (namely EndeavourOS & Manjaro). So, if it was caused by GE, then surely there would be all sorts of things broken with KDE too, right?
I’ll test this stuff out of curiosity later tonight!!
It occurs to me now I never searched for anything through the explorer.
Can I ask how you usually quickly jump to a specific sub-folder if you don’t type in the letters of the folder name?
That delay can be removed with plugins so its instant but I agree - adding delays makes no sense to me either.
And yeah I havent used windows or macs in a long time now.
The problem with plugins is what we can see with desktop icon extensions nowadays. GNOME removed their native desktop icons some time ago and all the subsequent extensions that popped up to get that functionality simply aren’t are good - you can’t drag and drop to some other places, there are weird things happening when you move icons and/or the selection box doesn’t make sense.
