• oatmilkmaid@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    383
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bitwarden all day every day. I don’t even know any of my passwords because they’re all randomly generated. Try to guess my password now hacker man

      • Zectivi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        88
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Same, just gotta watch out for sites that don’t support it and don’t tell you that they don’t. I got into a password reset loop with a site once, until I realized it was truncating my 20 character password to their supported max of 16. They never said the max was 16, and never game an error that 20 wasn’t allowed. Just simply an asshole design. I probably could check bitwarden for whatever password I changed the most and see if it’s still an issue with the site.

      • narshok@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there a legitimate reason to use 20 characters over 16? Genuinely asking. Bitwarden considers them both “strong”, taking centuries to crack.

        • Siors@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well the more characters you have the higher the entropy of the password and the harder it would be to crack. So when you don’t have to remember the password yourself there’s no reason not to use a very long password if the service you’re using allows it.

          • Coreidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except no one cracks passwords. Vast majority of hacks is through social networking and trojans. The days of password cracking are long over especially considering most services lock you out after several failed attempts.

            The main argument for using a password manager is so you can have a different password for every service. This way if they manage to obtain one password they can’t access everything.

            It also makes rotating passwords a lot easier so that way you’re not using the same password forever. If your password gets out hopefully it’s changed before they use it.

            • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Offline password cracking is still very much a thing. They steal the entire password database then crack it offline at their leisure, not live against the regular login.

              Several measures are required to defend against this:

              • Hash seeds defend against rainbow tables.
              • Password length & complexity as well as using computationally-intensive hash algorithms defend against the brute-force cracking.
              • Password managers help with length and complexity, sad well as promote not reusing passwords.
        • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s realistically no reason not to generate the max password. The different in possibilities between a password with 16 characters and one with 20 (using a-zA-Z0-9!@#$%^&*()?-+." which isn’t even all the options) is 1.2E30 v s 4.13E37. That’s seven orders of magnitude from 4 characters. The difference between $1 and $10,000,000. But to be fair, 1.2E30 possible combinations is kind of a lot already, but why not add a few more characters just for the hell of it?

          • StudioLE@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you always use the maximum then the length of your password becomes predictable which reduces the number of permutations.

            It’s probably better to use a password of around 60-100% of the maximum

            • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, that’s true. And that’s usually the case since I typically use a slider. But if you password is 100 characters, numbers, and symbols, I don’t think telling them the exact length is going to help much.

    • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use Bitwarden!! It’s great cause I have a long complicated password to access the vault (my phone will do it by fingerprint though) but it’s the only password I need to actually memorize. Don’t know how someone can be secure without one nowadays, way too many services

      • LonelyWendigo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why bother locking the door if you’re going to leave copies of the keys all over town? I guess on the upside you’re still protected from people without physical access to you. Maybe I have trust issues.

    • soloner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use it too but honestly I find it annoying to use the collections and a lot of the UI. I just want something basic where I can fingerprint/pin access my passwords and a basic search function.