• ladel@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right now, cars are (road) taxed on their emissions, with EVs paying nothing. I think you would need to exempt heavy EVs from it still, but going forward when ICEs are banned (2030 for personal cars), or a bit before, it could be a good sceheme.

    • taladar@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could always tax by emissions and weight. EVs are not really the solution to the general car problem anyway. Mass transit is, at least in cities and other densely populated areas.

      • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think we agree but I still need to point out: Individual transport will always be a requirement for living in rural areas. The “fuck cars” sentiment only makes sense in cities with more than ~3 million inhabitants.

        • Arbic@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I agree with the sentiment on cars in the city, I’d say that it is already viable in much smaller cities. I live in a city with 350k inhabitants and I’m doing quite well without a car.

          • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            For sure. But forbidding cars doesn’t make sense until you have several millions of people in a single city.

        • ECB@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          3 million is gigantic! The country I’m in currently barely has that many people

          You can do car-free at any size if its planned right.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What are you smoking lmao, do you seriously think anything below 3 million people is rural?

          rural is when it takes you an hour to reach the nearest grocery store by car.

          • andrai@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not rural, that’s ultra remote wilderness. Like what place doesn’t have a grocery store in a 100km radius? Some place deep in the Australian outback?

            • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Village of ~10k, nearest grocery store is 25min walk, 10min bike, 5min car.

              There are also three smaller stores a 2 min walk away. Europe for reference

              • andrai@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I sincerely doubt there is a a place in Europe outside of maybe remote Scandinavia or Russia where you can’t get to a grocery store after driving for an hour.

              • andrai@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                My definition of rural is a place with some semblance of human habitation that is not urban. A speck of land characterized by villages, farms or forestry. Where you have limited access to the amenities found in cities.

                However, what village does not have a grocery store? Or at least not one in the next bigger village?

                Do you have some examples of villages without a grocery store an hour of driving away?

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All UK residents pay road tax, whether they own a vehicle or not. You’re referring to emissions tax, which only the vehicle owner pays.

      • ladel@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we’re being pedantic, there is no road tax or emissions tax, there’s only “vehicle tax”, which is £0 for EV owners. But everyone calls it road tax still.

        • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s called ‘vehicle exercise duty’. At least get it right if you’re going to be pedantic. It is directly related to emissions, therefore emissions tax is more appropriate for a nickname.