produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agobugsdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1222arrow-down15
arrow-up1217arrow-down1imagebugsdiscuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareNailbar@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-21 year agoIt looks like it’s decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary. But that’s just a wild guess. I don’t know what actual decompiled code looks like.
minus-squarehemmes@vlemmy.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t think you’re far off because obfuscated code usually has less structured variable references.
minus-squareSurpriseWaterfall@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It’s almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names.
It looks like it’s decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary.
But that’s just a wild guess. I don’t know what actual decompiled code looks like.
I don’t think you’re far off because obfuscated code usually has less structured variable references.
I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It’s almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names.