frippa@lemmy.ml to Always the Same Map@lemmygrad.ml · 7 months agoGlobal burger indexlemmy.mlimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1113arrow-down11
arrow-up1112arrow-down1imageGlobal burger indexlemmy.mlfrippa@lemmy.ml to Always the Same Map@lemmygrad.ml · 7 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareMagicicad@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up21·7 months agoHow is this index calculated? Is it pluralism? Because then China would be more “free” than the US.
minus-squarelil_tank@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14·7 months agoAccording to their own biaises China has absolute zero pluralism because it’s a “one party state”
minus-squareporcupine@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up24·edit-27 months agoChina - 1 party - dictatorship US - 2 parties - democracy Russia - 8 parties - dictatorship the numbers don’t lie
minus-square🏳️⚧️Edward [it/its]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up17·7 months agoChina - 1 9 parties - dictatorship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_People's_Congress
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·7 months agoI don’t know, other than they start with their conclusion and work backward to construct metrics to fit it. Hannah Arendt would be proud.
minus-squarexkyfal18@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·7 months agoSenator Armstrong is just your average US politician
How is this index calculated? Is it pluralism? Because then China would be more “free” than the US.
According to their own biaises China has absolute zero pluralism because it’s a “one party state”
China - 1 party - dictatorship
US - 2 parties - democracy
Russia - 8 parties - dictatorship
the numbers don’t lie
China -
19 parties - dictatorshiphttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_People's_Congress
I don’t know, other than they start with their conclusion and work backward to construct metrics to fit it. Hannah Arendt would be proud.
Senator Armstrong is just your average US politician