• Anamana@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Wait… but being gay is also a spectrum. It’s a bad example. Or am I not getting the point? It’s just less socially accepted to admit it, which is why people would deny it.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The fact that they’re both spectrums is exactly the point, and why it’s a good example. Notice how the character on the right immediately and firmly deny being at all gay, even though sexuality is a spectrum.

      “Gay” and “autistic” are both social constructs layered over top of a spectrum of fluid differences and preferences from plastic brains. Yet the “we’re all a little bit” folks have no issue using that underlying spectrum to invalidate the needs of groups who need them to behave differently while vehemently denying the fuzzy nature of other other spectra that would logically necessitate giving respect to people they don’t want to humanize.

      Classes higher up the social hegemony ladder are choosing how they view the fuzzy nature of human behaviour and needs so they can wield it as a weapon.

    • Pm_me_girl_dick@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure being gay is less stigmatised. At least in Northern and Western Europe. Can’t speak for the rest of the world. In Norway there’s a hierarchy of stigma. From most accepted to least it goes:

      Straight white Norwegians

      Gay white Norwegians

      Straight non white Norwegians

      Straight white foreigners

      Gay non white Norwegians

      Gay white foreigners

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      Transgender people and autists

      Russians