EDIT: no, I don’t sympathize with nazis (neither I sympathize with those who call everyone nazi when they’re losing an argument ;)

  • AlpineSteakHouse [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    What a terrible mistake to make! Perhaps you should have assumed it was the correct orientation of the two words that are spelled exactly the same.

    Your beef is with the English Language not me. How is it my fault that you misidentified yourself? Funnily enough, you still don’t identify your actual political position. It’s clear that the only political position you’d take is what gives you an advantage in the argument. Fucking debatebros lol.

    I have, but thanks for the suggestion.

    Reading so much theory that you confuse two different political ideologies. Sometimes I read so much theory that that I claim to be a monarchist when I really mean to say I’m an anti-monarchist. Obviously the other person should have understood what I meant. Your literally on a communication medium that allows you to plan and edit your comments. You have no excuse for making this grade school mistake.

    • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Debatebro? That’s what Hexbear does best.

      I would actually love to engage in good faith discussions, but Hexbear users only operate in bad faith, particularly by sealioning. Like clockwork, you don’t engage in ideas but rather give reading assignments.

      I’ve read Das Kapital and agree with virtually all the premises about how society is unfair to those who actually generate the surplus value and think that we need to fix a system that breaks cyclically, as Karl Marx correctly predicted in volume I. The only solutions I’ve seen presented are a total revolution a la 1917, which occured before globalization. Anything close to this in the current globalized world will kill at minimum hundreds of millions globally due to interdependence on products that Marx would consider “needs”, such as medications and medical equipment like dialysis machines.

      The difference between you and me is that I’d rather work to reestablish democracy away from capital interests. I don’t want a dictatorship, I want a functional democracy. Propaganda is often used to disillusion the working class from democracy, and if you don’t vote in elections then you are clearly part of the problem.

      Edit: Lmao. Citing"theory" gets crickets from the people who endlessly say “you just haven’t read theory”. It’s like they don’t know what to do with someone who reads to understand, rather than “reading” just to virtue signal.

      • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        reading" just to virtue signal.

        Lmao peak angry chud solipsism. “I would never read except to lord it over others, so that must be what these commies are doing.”

      • DPRK_Chopra [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is a childish understanding of the theory you purport to have studied. What’s your concrete proposal to “reestablish democracy away from capital interests” that has actually worked?

        I don’t want a dictatorship

        We do. It’s called a dictatorship of the proletariat and it’s actually worked.

          • DPRK_Chopra [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Cuba, China, USSR all saw massive gains in just about every measurable metric post revolution because they adhere to the theory that says you have to work to actively suppress the worst urges of the ownership class, aka the people who destroyed the biosphere and possibly life on earth for short term gains. The liberal rely your probably already wanting to type is to whinge about how these systems still had their flaws, arent perfect utopias, are authoritarian (yes, against capital) etc, but at least they get results and aren’t idealism, but actual application of a rigorous program.

            • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Cuba is your best example, however, it is a socialist state and not communism.

              China has three stock exchanges and is not communist:

              The USSR never got to the “people’s dictatorship”, ya know, because the dictators never completed that step. Despite being a very powerful country at their peak, the USSR only exists as a memory of a failed state.

              • DPRK_Chopra [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I’m too fucking bored of this already. It’s the same uninformed spew from you guys every time. I’m not going to even address your uninformed points here, maybe someone else who gives a shit will, idc.

                • mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  “The sky is green and I know you dumb neoliberal are going to try and tell me it’s blue!”

                  How do you reconcile the fact that China has more stock exchanges than BurgerlandUSA?

                  Pretty hard to defend, so I expected you to claim bad faith and throw in the towel. Your Hexbear friends have better endurance and wit.