• uzay@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Reaching for an unproven concept of “drilling really deep holes” that’s barely a few years old to convince people there is no problem with long-term storage of dangerous waste we’ve been accumulating for decades, but sure, I’m just a NIMBY.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Drilling deep holes is a great concept for geothermal energy. One might even forego the nuclear reactor part then and just do geothermal.

    • Forester@yiffit.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m glad you took the time to completely not read the article that I sent you. I know you didn’t read it because if you had read it, you would see that we have discovered several times over the past few billion years that nature had made its own deposits of nuclear material in the same manner as we are advising the waste to be deposited in. It’s not new science. We have evidence of it occurring naturally multiple times and no issues from that. No spread of radiation from that. No inundation of groundwater from that. But yes you’re correct and all the nuclear scientists are wrong clearly.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizontal_drillhole_disposal

      Next time you find a term you don’t understand. Try clicking on the hyperlink.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_geological_repository

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Whether it would work or not wasn’t even the main point of what I said. But that doesn’t matter to you anyway as your strategy to debate seems to be to call others stupid often enough until everyone else understands how smart you are. Good luck with that.

        • Forester@yiffit.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          if someone gives you cited information and you refuse to read the cited information, then You’re not stupid. You’re willfully ignorant which is far worse. It’s not dangerous waste if it’s properly handled and treated and disposed of.