• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nah, police weren’t adequately trained to handle something on this scale. Something had to be done, but not by police with satchel charges and an anti-tank machinegun.

      • RalfWausE@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        In WWI there were attempts to bring down early tanks with heavy machine guns (the armor was not that thick back then)… but i am not sure if this is an official category.

        • weebkent
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          ehhhh, I assume the guy meant an anti-material rifle? or some sort of autocannon if it actually is like a machinegun because anti-tank rifles are very antiquated and not a thing anymore, at least as a modern term for these weapons. That kind of thing got phased out since world war 2.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            My best guess is that they meant an M2 browning and just knew they were mounted on some tanks, then assumed they were meant for tanks. They were meant for AP and AA use if im not misremembering.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        A big gun with big bullets that shoots really fast. Fuck if I know the model, but the police had and used it in this event.