• kworpy@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They stated that PSN was required from the start, and I get that it has shitty privacy and security but if you’re fine with a sketchy Korean company having root level access to your computer then I don’t get how that’s a problem. I dislike sony as much as the next person but this is just a hypocritical argument.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      More than anything it is a matter of principle and choice.

      Yes, the psn thing was listed somewhere deep down the steam page, where most users dont bother to look and people who are gifted the game will never ckeck. It was also disabled almost immediately, and many thousands of players bought the game and played it for months without ever being asked or informed to make a psn account. Evidently the game runs perfectly fine as is without any need or tangible advantage to enable it now, aside from obvious corporate greed. Even the security pretense they tried doesn’t track because as you point out there is a very invasive anti cheat running anyway.

      Meanwhile the anti cheat was also very unpopular, but players could make that choice themselves because it is well known, prominently displayed, and has been consistently a part of the game.

      Also, it is not hypocritical at all. One is for mostly legitimate reasons like cheat protection, the other is obvious and pure corporate greed. Not to mention that the assumption that if a person is willing to compromise their data to one party, they should he willing to give it to anyone else who asks as well, is a logical fallacy.

      • SharkAttak@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even worse, it was probably so one bigwig could boast to have boosted new accounts by n%, and get a fat bonus.