• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    No, what makes me powerless is that 99% of people who vote make the same choices every election regardless of the quality of the candidate.

    And that, I definitely cannot change.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      At some point in history, voting was about picking the best, most qualified candidate.

      In recent years, voting has become picking the person that makes the other color lose.

      I wonder what the Founding Fathers would think of what their country has become.

      • Jimbo@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        At some point in history, voting was about picking the best, most qualified candidate.

        In recent years, voting has become picking the person that makes the other color lose.

        I got some bad news for you buddy

        This issue is not recent by any stretch of the imagination.

        Also the founding fathers sucked and were constantly drunk slave holders.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Also the founding fathers sucked and were constantly drunk slave holders.

          Hey now, let a man have his drink now and again, or we’ll put another tax on whiskey.

          The best Founding Fathers were the abolitionists among them, though. Most of the slave-holders who shat up the founding are long-forgotten by popular culture, except for Jefferson and Madison.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I imagine most would be pleased. They only ever wanted the voice of wealthy men to matter in the first place, and now it’s the supreme law of the land.

        • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t think so, they were trying to get away from a government that pushed too heavily onto the people. Regardless, it was a question that can never have an answer, since we cannot ask them.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            When they created the United States, their Constitution only allowed the vote to wealthy male landowners.

            They’d be exceedingly pleased with the way things turned out. They never wanted common people to have any real voice beyond dying for wealthy people’s property.