• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool, but then you’re just a naive utopia dreamer. Capitalism is the best system we have right now, and it pays for a lot of social programs, can it be better sure but acting like communism is better is just flat out stupid.

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Capitalism is the best system we have right now

      Citation needed. Also, curious how capitalist countries are always so eager to stomp down any attempt at trying a different system, almost as if the rich really don’t want you to even believe a different system is possible 🤔

      and it pays for a lot of social programs

      It doesn’t pay, it steals. Social programs under capitalism are possible only by exploiting the global south.

      Cool, but then you’re just a naive utopia dreamer.

      Not wanting to be robbed by bosses and landlords is utopia, now? And you talk about it as if it was some theory that was never tried. Libertarian socialism already exists.

      can it be better sure but acting like communism is better is just flat out stupid.

      Because…? Can you even define what you mean with ‘communism’, or is it just some nebulous threat you got programmed to be afraid of? Not all socialists are Stalinists, which is what you seem to be implying…

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Capitalism is naivest utopia. There is no invisible limbs, monopoly will eventually form.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Living in a tribe in the jungle is better than capitalism because it’s not literally destroying the world. If you’re willing to consider utopian capitalism, then a utopia based on ideas that can theoretically work should be even easier.

      • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        A big meteor strike would be worse for most life on earth than even the climate crisis, and that will happen, sooner or later. In order to prevent that, you need a pretty high tech level.

        • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes and no. Yes by the time it would likely be detected on a collision course with Earth, at present, even the greatest minds can’t theorize a method to neutralize an asteroid => 5km in diameter that doesn’t cause an extinction event with the technology available to us right now.

          However, if it were detected soon enough there may be more tenable options for preventing an impact event that are not futile. The problem is we don’t have nearly enough resources monitoring deep space for our inevitable destruction and with a lot of our space tech now being privatized in the US it will be more difficult because there’s no profit incentive to being prepared for our doom. At least now that NASA is active again there will be an obvious taxpayer incentive to literally preventing our own annihilation…lol

          Edit to add article about early detection: https://www.planetary.org/defending-the-earth-from-impacts#:~:text=We can stop asteroids from,tends to focus on asteroids.

          • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The point is you aren’t going to stop an asteroid if you’re living in a tribe in the jungle.

            • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a dumb point. Might as well do nothing and continue to ravage the planet because there will be a meteorite somewhere in the next millions year.

              • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That doesn’t follow. If you care about whether or not humanity survives, those are not equivalent at all.

            • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but my point is that capitalism may as well be George of the jungle with everything it does to trade our future for revenue growth.