• Classy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not true, it specifically states in the article that, for example, one user had over 300 photos reappear, “some of which were revealing”. This is obviously not great but it isn’t likely as scandalous as it’s being made out to be.

        • azalty@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It was kinda wrote like a statement. People who didn’t read the article will read it as such, misinforming people

            • azalty@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              If misinformation is a minor issue to you, then I can’t do better

            • Classy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              There’s so much misinformation online, sure it could have been a joke but it’s so easy to just be lazy, read the comment straight and move on acting like there’s some kind of operation going on at Apple stealing your nudes. I don’t really care if it’s a joke or not, and you’re not even the OP so who are you to say it’s for a fact a joke?

              • azalty@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                That was the case for me, until I decided to read the article

                • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  What article, it’s just a link. If I can’t read it here it ain’t there.

                  We shouldn’t encourage post-bot behaviour in the posters, title+summary or gtfo.

          • Glytch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Since we’re being pedantic: the word you’re looking for is “written” not “wrote”.

            • azalty@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t see where I’ve mentioned a small English mistake. I said that it was written like a statement, which could misinform people