• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    The tldr says 72% efficient. If it can store excess solar or wind from times they are not in use and release at times of higher demand, it should be great.

    Better is always on the road to perfect.

    • kaboom36
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah that isn’t as horrible as I had initially thought, though its still not great

      You are right though something is better than nothing, but I wonder how this facilities cost compares to an equivalent battery storage facility

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        In all of this, we need diversity. Diversity of generation sources (solar, wind, tidal, etc). Diversity of storage (Chemical batteries, compressed air batteries, pumped hydro, etc). Each will have different sweet spots; cost vs reaction time vs capacity vs efficiency.

        Try not to dismiss a technology just because it’s not the whole solution. Nothing ever is. They all contribute a part to the big picture.