Nato’s failure to save Ukraine raises an existential question: what on earth is it for? | Simon Tisdall
www.theguardian.com
The military alliance is turning 75. But there’s little to celebrate in Kyiv, as Putin’s forces continue their bloody advance
  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    14·
    6 months ago

    NATO? Better to ask what is the UN for? They should have a standing army ready to slap down dictators and genocidal maniacs if they step out of line.

    • Lorindól@sopuli.xyz
      17·
      6 months ago

      UN will remain powerless as long as the permanent security council members have veto right. It never should have been introduced.