• Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    But setting aside the fact that a descendant of colonizers has the caucasity to tell the descendants of the colonized that they should “leave” the land they rightfully pointed out was stolen from them…

    Oh, that’s good.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Nope. Hating the bigotry of people who have skin color or another trait in common with yourself does not equal hating yourself. Caucasity is not a trait inherent to all white people.

        Contrary to the fantasies of bigots, white people are not one big team united against everyone else.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s not really a word. Also it clearly implies something is inherent to “Caucasians” - I can’t be bothered to do any clever wordplay on the other supposed racial categories, but I suspect any equivalent puns might be considered a little problematic, what what?

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s not really a word

            Since it’s used to convey meaning using letters and people understand that meaning, it by any definition that matters IS a word.

            Also it clearly implies something is inherent to “Caucasians”

            No. “Particularly Caucasians” ≠ “all Caucasians”.

            I can’t be bothered to do any clever wordplay on the other supposed racial categories

            Good, because that would likely be punching down, unlike pointing out how audacious some white people are with their privilege.

            but I suspect any equivalent puns might be considered a little problematic, what what?

            No, they wouldn’t be equivalent. Pointing out white privilege and criticizing those that wield it as both a sword and a shield is not the same as making fun of less privileged people or even white people who are aware of and don’t exploit their privilege.

            • Natanael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              That’s not really the right line to draw.

              Using it satirically to point out hypocrisy is one thing, and that’s fair (but you need to make it obvious). If people don’t get it’s a particular person’s actions you’re mocking then you’re doing it wrong