• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    yes this is the lie so many of us hate and the same lie that will elect trump who is fucking infinitely worse. I won’t argue back with any more smooth brains who say shit like this, I called you out on your lies and that’s enough.

    • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      a modern nation state with a mechanized military is absolutely indistinguishable from fascism.

      they will do whatever it takes to maintain the power of the state to field that military, so they will do whatever it takes to maintain the power of the state. everything else, the trappings of law and order, the facade of democratic control, the illusion of economic freedom, they will only exist so far as they are necessary to maintain state power.

      under pax americana, our mutual defense treaties have relieved many states of the necessity of fielding their own military to the extent necessary to defend their state, but the mutual defense treaties make them absolutely complicit in the fascism of the states capable of defending them. in particular, the usa, but any other military power as well.

      opposing the creep of outspoken politically fascist movements to seize the reigns of these technocratically fascist states is secondary, in my consideration, to the dismantling of the technocratic fascist states.

      it seems that you are content to tolerate the fascist state so long as someone you can’t identify as politically fascist controls it. i am not.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        a modern nation state with a mechanized military

        This describes nearly every country that has ever existed, so how does the term have any meaning if you’re right about this definition of fascism?

        it seems that you are content to tolerate the fascist state so long as someone you can’t identify as politically fascist controls it. i am not.

        … this is a conversation about policy difference. Somehow by saying “actually there’s a large difference” when there obviously is, means I have no issue with fascism? Nevermind that that would be an entirely separate topic that we only touched on because you brought it up apropos of nothing. I mean, that’s just brain dead. Your official position:

        “closing all the borders and eliminating all healthcare programs is literally the exact same as mostly maintaining the status quo then slowly adding improvements here and there. just like how boiling water is identical to lukewarm water.”

        I often wonder like what deluded thought process gets you from just going around saying smoothbrain bullshit like this and the perfect communist utopia you imagine? Are you actively eating lead every day or something? I don’t even know how I’d turn my brain off like that if I wanted to.

        • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          if you’re willing to vote for joe biden, knowing his policies up to this point, then you are willing to vote for fascism.

            • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Interesting you ignored the question of how that word could have meaning if it describes all countries

              if all countries implemented direct democracy, does direct democracy lose its meaning?

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Actually, kind of, yes. Because there wouldn’t need to be a distinction drawn… just how words work.

                  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Lol nope. The word human exists because other lifeforms do and you need a way to differentiate. Democracy is a word that exists because other governments exist. This is hilarious.

            • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              If you’re willing to pretend different things are the same,

              this is so vague it probably doesn’t even mean anything.