• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s apparently a “Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle”. What is it for: “It’s designed for high-water rescues (which saved many people this past week during the floods), active shooter situations, hostage rescues and other critical incidents, ensuring the safety of our officers and community,”

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      21 days ago

      Military surplus. Cheaper than buying a tahoe and loading it up with police equipment.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        There’s absolutely no fucking god damned way in the 7 hells that a Tahoe with Police shit in it $700,000.

        And if police departments are spending that much on a Tahoe, they need to be dismantled and investigated for embezzlement.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            I hope you realize what you’re saying is that taxpayers paid less for the same vehicle the second time than they did the first time.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              The police didn’t pay anything for it, apparently. It’s on loan from DoD

            • Kaboom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              21 days ago

              Well yes. I dont see the problem with reusing stuff. Hell, isnt the motto Reduce Reuse Recycle?

                • Kaboom@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  Theyre buying the truck from the military for near scrap value, its not like they’re paying 700k twice. And yes it is reusing.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    21 days ago

                    So it’s okay for the government to use taxpayer money twice for military surplus if it costs significantly less the second time?

                    Is there anything else people should be taxed twice for?

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            Do you have any idea how much it costs to service something like that??? You don’t take it down to the local garage. The thing probably costs 30k a year just in service costs.