• gila@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    They adjusted the level scaling for S3, with different thresholds depending on the world tier you’re in. As you approach the monster level cap for a given world tier, the scaling slows down so that it’s outpaced by the player level.

    I agree it shouldn’t have scaled 1:1 all the way to max level on launch, but people are super quick to forget how well D4 was generally received on launch. It was literally used as a counterexample to games that launched badly, “it was more like a toddler trying to make an MMO” seems like a dishonest characterisation to me. What complaints do you have that aren’t long since resolved?

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I mean, releasing one of the worst ARPGs of all time isn’t exactly a triumphant launch. I think D4 is fine now that it’s effectively become a sequel to D3, which is why I tried to use the past-tense as much as I could, but D4 was only received well by casuals. Every ARPG fan I know and every content creator I watched played it for like 2 days, realized there were deep systemic issues, and dipped.

      • gila@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        That’s just not consistent with the reality that Diablo 4 was released to wide acclaim. Wolcen was far worse than D4 in almost every area. I think you just got farmed for engagement, because contrarianism is trendy.

        • TauriWarrior@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Everyone I know that played at launch when I asked if it was worth getting told me no, even more so after the first few patches

          • gila@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_IV#Reception

            There wasn’t really any discontent online about the base game mechanics until there was discontent about the live service content for S1 a couple of months later.

            I might be ignoring nonsense complaints like about barb nerfs despite barb being consistently the most powerful class by a significant margin to this day, simply due to having more slots for more affixes & legendary powers

            • Gigagoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              12 days ago

              people were literally criticising the game so much on all the Diablo-related r/'s that i had to unsub from each one. like, yeah, it got good ratings, but if anything, that only served to further incense the ones displeased.

              there was a lot of stupid, toxic bs, for sure, but there were also players dipping out before the first season even began – myself included. like, this is just me, obviously, but D4 at launch was straight up the most let down i’ve ever been by a game.

              for brevity’s sake, i gotta say that season 4 made me wanna give D4 another shot. & you know, it’s fun now, but there are still elements to it that make me want to scream & that’s not gonna change, because it’s all a part of their vision for the core experience of the game.

              • gila@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                Ya, that’s a subreddit for an online game tho - being a circlejerk of negativity is like its primary function, even for breakout hits like Helldivers or The Finals. It’s part of why I left reddit completely, and why “someone online said it’s bad” doesn’t pass the sniff test for legitimate criticism for me. As an ARPG enthusiast, I went in with the expectation that it was neither POE nor Diablo Immortal; that I’d play it alongside other ARPG’s cyclically; that it’d be made or broken by the quality of the seasonal content & meta.

                I understand it fell short of others’ expectations, but I think that’s primarily an issue with the expectations. That I’d rather play D4 right now over PoE or Last Epoch doesn’t mean that those aren’t great games, they just don’t have that fresh content right now and that’s ok, despite that you can easily find equivalent negative discourse about it. And if D4 S5 sucks, the inverse will also be true.

                • Gigagoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  yeah, okay. all i’m saying is, parts of the internet were practically incandescent with negativity towards the game, a not insignificant amount of which had to do with the base mechanics. like, there are content creators currently reporting on how season 4 is turning things around, which wouldn’t be noteworthy if the game hadn’t been hemorrhaging players almost immediately after launch.

                  D4 released to “wide acclaim” where the critics are concerned, yes, but a sizable portion of the audience clearly didn’t agree. like, the game was practically a meme until recently.

                  • gila@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    I think you’re playing into a content creator-driven narrative that doesn’t quite exist for the reasons you think. It isn’t quite as simple as D4 bad, followed by D4 saved (or the delicate nuance of ‘D4 mid’). Indeed masses already flipped their use of these polar opposite terms several times since its release. This is more of a treadmill you’re on to drive engagement, views. If you’re bored with a game, that doesn’t necessarily have to be because the game is bad. It could just be that the available content has run its natural course for you. This explanation just doesn’t compel people to watch videos about it, though. It can be more satisfying to have it explained to you that there is a problem with the game, that some external factor is inhibiting your enjoyment of it.

                    I just don’t think that is an accurate representation of reality in this case. I think the latent majority audience isn’t terminally online, doesn’t form their opinions based on what a content creator said, doesn’t watch a line on the steam charts page and cheer when its direction validates them. They just play the game until they’re done, and enjoy their time with it. And that by no means is the same thing as being a ‘casual’.