Why? I don’t know, maybe someone here will like it.

  • aski3252@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well it’s not bad in theory, it just runs like ass… This version already runs 10 times faster than the real thing, sometimes I wonder what the hell is going on over at Microsoft.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing is when your system is dying and nothing is responding, you can almost always trust task manager to respond because of its privileges, simplicity and the fact it’s built into the OS rather than using APIs, even if explorer.exe crashes.

      Given there’s no “ctrl-alt-f2: Imma go fix this mess” on Windows, having at least something you can rely on to not die is super valuable even if it is bad.

      I’m not saying this tool isn’t better for system monitoring (but I would like to see something like KSysGuard), just that Microsoft absolutely shouldn’t touch task manager to fix whatever’s wrong with it’s resource usage monitoring functionality to avoid breaking something else in it

    • Task manager is one of the most lightweight tools Windows has these days. It’s not slow at all.

      “More data points in the graph” doesn’t mean the code runs any better. Task manager needs to run on machines where making basic graphs takes up 25% of a CPU core, there’s no need to waste CPU cycles taking 60 measurements per second.